Summary
A 43-year-old defense contractor and retired Navy chief petty officer was granted a security clearance despite concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The Statement of Reasons detailed a history of financial difficulties, including a Chapter 7 bankruptcy and multiple delinquent debts. These included judgments from March 2007 for $1,361 and May 2008 for $1,173, along with various other outstanding debts ranging from $25 to $2,884 owed to credit card companies, collection agencies, a university, and service providers.
The judge found that the applicant had taken significant steps to address these financial issues. He demonstrated a proactive approach to resolving his debts, making good-faith efforts to pay them off, and had achieved a stable financial situation by the time of the hearing. Furthermore, the judge determined that the applicant did not intentionally falsify his security clearance application.
Mitigating conditions were applied, including evidence of good-faith efforts to resolve the debts and a stable financial outlook. Character references also supported the applicant's reliability and trustworthiness. Based on these factors, the applicant was granted eligibility for access to classified information.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant demonstrated a proactive approach to resolving his financial issues after becoming aware of them.
- He made good-faith efforts to pay off delinquent debts and had a stable financial situation at the time of the hearing.
- The applicant's character references supported his reliability and trustworthiness.
Conditions Referenced
- F.19(a)raisedInability or Unwillingness to Satisfy Debts
- F.19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
- F.20(b)appliedConditions That Resulted in the Financial Problem Were Largely Beyond the Person’s Control
- F.20(d)appliedThe Individual Initiated a Good-faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors or Otherwise Resolve Debts
- F.20(c)appliedThe Person Has Received or Is Receiving Counseling for the Problem And/or There Are Clear Indications That the Problem Is Being Resolved or Is Under Control
- E.16(a)rejectedDeliberate Omission, Concealment, or Falsification of Relevant FactsThe applicant did not intentionally omit financial information from his SF 86.
Key Rule Quoted
“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedJan 22, 2009
- Answer filedFeb 19, 2009
- Hearing heldMay 18, 2009via video teleconference
- Decision dateJun 9, 2009
Cite For
- Mitigation of Financial Issues Under Guideline F
- Consideration of Personal Conduct in Security Clearance Evaluations
- Good-faith Efforts to Resolve Debts as a Mitigating Factor