Summary
A 63-year-old government contractor was denied a security clearance under Guideline F (Financial Considerations) due to significant financial delinquencies totaling $603,433. The applicant had 11 alleged delinquent accounts, including medical debts, a judgment, credit card debt, and multiple mortgages.
While some debts were resolved, such as two medical accounts, a judgment, and a home equity line of credit that received full forgiveness, several substantial debts remained unaddressed. These included a $65 medical debt, a $22,000 credit card account, a $109,000 mortgage, a $49,000 secondary mortgage where the applicant failed to inform the creditor of a change in property use, and a $1,554 account that remained disputed. Two other mortgages, totaling $154,000 and $97,000, were resolved through foreclosure with no remaining liability.
Ultimately, the applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to resolve remaining debts totaling $181,619. The decision noted that the financial delinquencies were ongoing and unresolved despite the applicant securing full-time employment in 2009, and that the applicant did not demonstrate a meaningful track record in resolving financial issues. The security clearance was DENIED.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- Applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence addressing remaining debts totaling $181,619.
- Financial delinquencies were ongoing and unresolved despite securing full-time employment in 2009.
- Applicant did not demonstrate a meaningful track record in resolving financial issues.
Conditions Referenced
- AG ¶ 19(a)raisedInability or Unwillingness to Satisfy Debts
- AG ¶ 19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
- AG ¶ 20(a)rejectedBehavior Happened so Long Ago, Was Infrequent, or Unlikely to RecurApplicant's financial delinquencies are ongoing.
- AG ¶ 20(b)rejectedConditions Largely Beyond the Person's ControlApplicant failed to explain continued delinquencies after employment.
- AG ¶ 20(c)rejectedReceived Counseling for the ProblemInsufficient evidence of effective counseling.
- AG ¶ 20(d)rejectedGood-faith Effort to Repay Overdue CreditorsLack of documentation showing efforts to resolve debts.
- AG ¶ 20(e)rejectedReasonable Basis to Dispute Legitimacy of Past-due DebtInsufficient documentation to support disputes.
Key Rule Quoted
“A security clearance adjudication is not a debt collection procedure. It is a process designed to evaluate an applicant’s judgment, reliability, and trustworthiness.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedDec 18, 2012
- Answer filedJan 14, 2013
- Hearing heldApr 9, 2013
- Decision dateApr 30, 2013
Cite For
- Evaluation of Financial Considerations Under Guideline F
- Impact of Unresolved Debts on Security Clearance Eligibility
- Importance of Demonstrating a Meaningful Track Record in Resolving Financial Issues