Summary
A 59-year-old defense contractor employee was granted a security clearance despite concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The applicant faced allegations regarding approximately $26,686 in debts and the intentional omission of debts on his November 4, 2011 e-QIP.
Specifically, the applicant had a $328 dental debt, which he paid in full. He also had two credit card debts, one for approximately $9,150 and another for about $17,204, both incurred while his wife was unemployed. For these, he established payment arrangements and demonstrated consistent payments from August through December 2013 for the first, and October to December 2013 for the second. A $4 debt was successfully contested and removed as an error.
The judge found no intentional omission of debts on the e-QIP. The applicant demonstrated responsible financial behavior by repaying one debt, successfully contesting another, and making payment arrangements for the remaining obligations. His financial difficulties were attributed to circumstances beyond his control, primarily his wife's unemployment. Based on these mitigating factors, eligibility for a security clearance was granted.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant acted responsibly by repaying one debt in full and contesting another debt successfully.
- The applicant made payment arrangements for remaining debts and is current on payments to the IRS.
- The applicant's financial difficulties were attributed to circumstances beyond his control, including his wife's unemployment.
Conditions Referenced
- F.19(c)raisedHistory of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
- E.16(a)raisedDeliberate Omission, Concealment, or Falsification of Relevant Facts
- F.20(a)appliedBehavior Happened Long Ago or Infrequently
- F.20(b)appliedConditions Resulting in Financial Problems Were Largely Beyond the Person's Control
- F.20(c)appliedReceived Counseling for the Problem And/or Indications That the Problem Is Being Resolved
- F.20(d)appliedGood-faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors
- F.20(e)appliedReasonable Basis to Dispute the Legitimacy of the Past-due Debt
- E.17(a)appliedNo Deliberate Omission of Relevant Facts
Key Rule Quoted
“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedJul 24, 2013
- Answer filedAug 30, 2013
- Hearing heldDec 16, 2013Rescheduled from November 21, 2013.
- Decision dateJan 15, 2014
Cite For
- Mitigating Conditions for Financial Difficulties Under Guideline F
- Considerations for Personal Conduct Regarding Omissions on E-qip
- Whole-person Analysis in Security Clearance Decisions