Summary
This case concerns a 51-year-old married male with a Master's Degree in Criminal Justice who sought a security clearance under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The applicant faced allegations of financial issues, including $15,000 in back taxes for 2007, reduced to about $4,000 under a payment plan, and $4,000 owed in county property taxes. Other debts included a $7,850 second home loan, a $40,000 home equity line of credit, and a mortgage account 120 days past due with an approximate amount of $2,412 and a balance of $409,397.00. Debts to a bank for a delinquent credit card ($3,212) and a cellular telephone company ($276) were discharged in bankruptcy.
Disqualifying conditions 19(a) and 19(c) were raised, but mitigating conditions 20(b), 20(c), and 20(d) were applied. The judge found that the applicant's financial problems were largely beyond his control, stemming from unexpected medical emergencies and job loss.
The applicant demonstrated significant efforts to resolve his debts, including filing for bankruptcy and hiring a financial advisor. He showed evidence of financial rehabilitation and a commitment to living within his means. Based on these factors, the security clearance was GRANTED.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant demonstrated that his financial issues were largely due to circumstances beyond his control, including health problems and job loss.
- He took proactive steps to address his financial situation, including hiring a financial advisor and filing for bankruptcy.
- The applicant showed evidence of financial rehabilitation and a commitment to living within his means.
Conditions Referenced
- 19(a)raisedInability or Unwillingness to Satisfy Debts
- 19(c)raisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
- 20(b)appliedConditions That Resulted in the Financial Problem Were Largely Beyond the Person’s Control
- 20(c)appliedThe Person Has Received or Is Receiving Counseling for the Problem And/or There Are Clear Indications That the Problem Is Being Resolved or Is Under Control
- 20(d)appliedThe Individual Initiated a Good-faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors or Otherwise Resolve Debts
Key Rule Quoted
“The adjudicative process is the careful weighing of a number of variables known as the whole-person concept.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedFeb 19, 2014
- Answer filedMar 10, 2014
- Hearing heldMay 15, 2014
- Decision dateJun 27, 2014
Cite For
- Mitigating Conditions Under Guideline F Due to Circumstances Beyond Control
- Good-faith Efforts to Resolve Financial Issues
- Whole-person Assessment in Security Clearance Determinations