Summary
A 39-year-old owner of a defense contracting company was evaluated for security clearance, facing concerns under Guideline E (Personal Conduct) and Guideline F (Financial Considerations). The Statement of Reasons cited two financial issues: a $36,542 past-due mortgage loan, with an outstanding balance of $309,546, which resulted in a February 2011 foreclosure, and a charged-off credit card debt of $18,909. Additionally, the applicant failed to disclose both the foreclosure and the delinquent credit card debt on his e-QIP.
The judge found that the applicant's financial difficulties stemmed primarily from a back injury that caused unemployment. All debts were subsequently resolved; the mortgage lender indicated the applicant was not personally liable for the remaining debt, and the credit card debt was settled with a final payment of $14,182.02 in September 2009. The applicant also completed financial counseling.
Crucially, the omissions on the e-QIP were determined to be unintentional, not indicative of a lack of candor or intent to deceive. Given that the debts were resolved, the financial issues were largely beyond his control, and the omissions were unintentional, the security clearance was GRANTED.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The applicant's financial difficulties were largely due to circumstances beyond his control, specifically a back injury that led to unemployment.
- All debts were resolved, and the applicant completed financial counseling.
- The omissions on the e-QIP were unintentional and did not indicate a lack of candor or intent to deceive.
Conditions Referenced
- F.1.araisedInability or Unwillingness to Satisfy Debts
- F.1.craisedA History of Not Meeting Financial Obligations
- E.2.araisedDeliberate Omission, Concealment, or Falsification of Relevant Facts
- F.2.aappliedThe Behavior Happened so Long Ago, Was so Infrequent, or Occurred Under Such Circumstances That It Is Unlikely to Recur
- F.2.bappliedThe Conditions That Resulted in the Financial Problem Were Largely Beyond the Person’s Control
- F.2.cappliedThe Person Has Received or Is Receiving Counseling for the Problem
- F.2.dappliedThe Individual Initiated a Good-faith Effort to Repay Overdue Creditors or Otherwise Resolve Debts
- E.2.aappliedThe Conduct Was Not Intentional and Did Not Indicate a Lack of Candor
Key Rule Quoted
“The protection of the national security is the paramount consideration.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedOct 15, 2015
- Answer filedNov 12, 2015
- Hearing heldMar 2, 2016
- Decision dateMar 17, 2016
Cite For
- Mitigation of Financial Difficulties Under Guideline F Due to Circumstances Beyond Control
- Unintentional Omissions on E-qip Not Indicative of Lack of Candor Under Guideline E
- Successful Rehabilitation and Financial Counseling as Mitigating Factors