Summary
A 26-year-old dual U.S.-Norwegian citizen was denied a security clearance due to concerns under Guideline B (Foreign Influence) and Guideline C (Foreign Preference). The denial was based on several factors, including the Applicant's possession and use of a Norwegian passport, his voting in Norwegian elections, and his acceptance of educational benefits from Norway. The Applicant also maintained his Norwegian citizenship to obtain free education and had not taken steps to relinquish his Norwegian passport.
Further concerns included the Applicant's past part-time jobs with Norwegian companies and as a corresponding journalist for a Norwegian-American newspaper, as well as summer jobs in Norway while attending school. While the Applicant's financial interests in his father's business and his Norwegian bank account held minimal balances, these did not sufficiently mitigate the overall concerns.
The judge determined that the Applicant's actions, particularly holding a Norwegian passport and voting in Norwegian elections, demonstrated a preference for a foreign country. Additionally, his family ties to Norway raised foreign influence issues. Despite some mitigating factors, the Applicant's failure to relinquish his Norwegian passport, as required by policy, contributed to the final decision to deny the security clearance.
Why the Applicant Was Denied
- The Applicant holds dual citizenship with the US and Norway, indicating foreign preference.
- The Applicant possesses a Norwegian passport and has voted in Norwegian elections, which raises security concerns.
- The Applicant has not taken steps to relinquish his Norwegian passport as required by the ASDC3I memo.
Conditions Referenced
- E2.A3.1.2.1raisedExercise of Dual Citizenship
- E2.A3.1.2.2raisedPossession And/or Use of a Foreign Passport
- E2.A3.1.2.4raisedAccepting Benefits From a Foreign Country
- E2.A3.1.2.8raisedVoting in Foreign Elections
- E2.A2.1.3.1appliedImmediate Family Members Are Not Agents of a Foreign Power
- E2.A2.1.3.3appliedContact with Foreign Citizens Is Casual and Infrequent
Key Rule Quoted
“"the clearly consistent standard indicates that security clearance determinations should err, if they must, on the side of denials."”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedJan 28, 2002
- Answer filedFeb 1, 2002
- Hearing heldApr 4, 2002
- Decision dateApr 18, 2002
Cite For
- Foreign Preference Due to Dual Citizenship Under Guideline C
- Foreign Influence Concerns Related to Family Ties Under Guideline B
- Impact of Foreign Passport Possession on Security Clearance Eligibility