Summary
A U.S. citizen, originally from Taiwan, was granted a security clearance despite initial concerns under Guideline B (Foreign Influence) and Guideline C (Foreign Preference). The Statement of Reasons cited his dual citizenship with Taiwan, his physical possession of a Taiwanese passport, and the presence of multiple immediate family members residing in Taiwan. These conditions raised disqualifying concerns regarding foreign preference and potential foreign influence.
However, the applicant successfully mitigated these concerns. He formally renounced his Taiwanese citizenship and surrendered his passport, demonstrating a clear commitment to the United States. Additionally, both the applicant and his spouse expressed a strong preference for raising their children and pursuing their education in the U.S.
Crucially, there was no evidence to suggest that the applicant's family members in Taiwan were agents of a foreign power or that they could exert undue coercion over him. Based on these mitigating factors, the security clearance was granted.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- Applicant formally renounced his Taiwanese citizenship and surrendered his passport, demonstrating commitment to the U.S.
- The applicant and his spouse expressed a clear preference for living in the U.S. for their children's education.
- No evidence indicated that the applicant's family members in Taiwan were agents of a foreign power or could coerce him.
Conditions Referenced
- E2.A3.1.2.1raisedExercise of Dual Citizenship
- E2.A3.1.2.2raisedPossession And/or Use of a Foreign Passport
- E2.A3.1.3.1rejectedDual Citizenship Is Based Solely on Parents' Citizenship or Birth in a Foreign Country
- E2.A3.1.3.4appliedIndividual Has Expressed a Willingness to Renounce Dual Citizenship
- E2.A2.1.3.1appliedImmediate Family Members Are Not Agents of a Foreign Power
- E2.A2.1.3.5appliedForeign Financial Interests Are Minimal
Key Rule Quoted
“Each adjudicative decision must also include an assessment of: (1) the nature, extent, and seriousness of the conduct; (2) the circumstances surrounding the conduct, and the extent of knowledgeable participation; (3) how recent and frequent the behavior was; (4) the individual's age and maturity at the time of the conduct; (5) the voluntariness of participation; (6) the presence or absence of rehabilitation and other pertinent behavioral changes; (7) the motivation for the conduct; (8) the potential for pressure, coercion, exploitation, or duress; and (9) the likelihood of continuation or recurrence.”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedNov 14, 2002
- Answer filedDec 4, 2002Applicant requested a hearing.
- Hearing heldMar 17, 2003Hearing convened by Administrative Judge Howe.
- Decision dateApr 28, 2003
Cite For
- Mitigation of Foreign Preference Concerns Through Formal Renunciation of Citizenship
- Demonstrating Preference for U.S. Residency Despite Family Ties Abroad
- Assessment of Foreign Influence Based on Family Relationships and Their Potential for Coercion