Summary
A 42-year-old electrical engineer, a naturalized U.S. citizen originally from Iran, sought a security clearance under Guideline B (Foreign Influence) and Guideline C (Foreign Preference). Concerns were raised regarding her dual citizenship with Iran and her family's connections there. Specifically, the Applicant, her husband, and her daughter, all naturalized U.S. citizens, had been born in Iran. The Applicant had traveled to Iran in 1994, 2000, and 2004, using an Iranian passport for the last trip. Her mother-in-law, in frail health, resides in Iran.
To address these concerns, the Applicant and her husband renounced their Iranian citizenship in writing and testified about their issues with the current Iranian government, expressing no desire to return. They had renewed their Iranian passports in 2003 for a wedding trip, but after the hearing, they returned their defaced Iranian passports to the Iranian Interests Section. The Applicant's daughter also renounced her Iranian citizenship and has never traveled to Iran.
The judge found that the Applicant successfully mitigated the concerns. She renounced her Iranian citizenship and returned her defaced Iranian passport, demonstrating compliance with the Money Memorandum. Her family members in Iran were not deemed agents of the Iranian government and did not pose a security risk. Additionally, her financial interests in Iran were minimal compared to her substantial U.S. assets. Consequently, the security clearance was GRANTED.
Why the Applicant Prevailed
- The Applicant renounced her Iranian citizenship and returned her defaced Iranian passport, demonstrating compliance with the Money Memorandum.
- The Applicant's family members in Iran are not agents of the Iranian government and do not pose a security risk.
- The Applicant's financial interests in Iran are minimal compared to her substantial assets in the United States.
Conditions Referenced
- E2.A2.1.2.1raisedForeign Influence
- E2.A3.1.2.1raisedForeign Preference
- E2.A2.1.3.1appliedForeign Influence Mitigation
- E2.A2.1.3.5appliedForeign Influence Mitigation
- E2.A3.1.3.1appliedForeign Preference Mitigation
- E2.A3.1.3.4appliedForeign Preference Mitigation
Key Rule Quoted
“"Any determination under this order...shall be a determination in terms of the national interest and shall in no sense be a determination as to the loyalty of the applicant concerned."”
Procedural Posture
- SOR issuedFeb 22, 2005
- Answer filedApr 13, 2005
- Hearing heldAug 15, 2005
- Decision dateDec 19, 2005
Cite For
- Mitigation of Foreign Influence Concerns Under Guideline B
- Mitigation of Foreign Preference Issues Under Guideline C
- Impact of Renouncing Foreign Citizenship on Security Clearance Eligibility