Skip to content
CASE
← Department of Energy hearings

Department of Energy · 10 CFR Part 710

Browse Department of Energy decisions

The published Energy Department hearing decisions. Filter by result, concern, or year. Reading a decision is free.

Two things to keep in mind about these numbers

These are hearing decisions only. The Energy Department resolves many cases without a hearing. What is here is the set that reached a hearing and produced a published decision, so it does not describe how the Energy Department decides cases overall.

A favorable decision is not the final word. In the Energy Department process a decision in the individual's favor can still be appealed by the agency, so a favorable result here is what the judge decided, not necessarily the settled outcome.

Department of Energy only

This list holds no DOHA cases, and no figure on this site adds the two records together. The words differ as well: a Department of Energy applicant receives a Notification Letter with a Summary of Security Concerns attached (not a Statement of Reasons), the government is represented by DOE Counsel (not Department Counsel), the rulebook is 10 CFR Part 710, and a review of the result is heard by the DOE Headquarters Appeal Panel. Results are favorable or not favorable to the individual, never granted or denied.

  • PSH-12-0076

    Year
    2012
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman

  • PSH-12-0063

    Year
    2012
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J) · Financial considerations (F) · Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    William M. Schwartz

  • PSH-12-0057

    Year
    2012
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Criminal conduct (J) · Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Not stated

  • PSH-12-0071

    Year
    2012
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Guideline M
    Administrative Judge
    Steven L. Fine

  • PSH-12-0066

    Year
    2012
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    Richard A. Cronin, Jr.

  • PSH-12-0053

    Year
    2012
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Diane DeMoura

  • PSH-12-0035

    Year
    2012
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F) · Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    David M. Petrush

  • PSH-12-0050

    Year
    2012
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Psychological conditions (I) · Personal conduct (E) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Kent S. Woods

  • PSH-12-0041

    Year
    2012
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Guideline M
    Administrative Judge
    David M. Petrush

  • PSH-12-0009

    Year
    2012
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    David M. Petrush

  • PSH-11-0032

    Year
    2012
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F) · Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    Steven J. Goering

  • PSH-12-0002

    Year
    2012
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Drug involvement (H)
    Administrative Judge
    Valerie Vance Adeyeye

  • PSH-11-0015

    Year
    2012
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F) · Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    William M. Schwartz

  • TSO-1108

    Year
    2012
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    Steven J. Goering

  • PSH-12-0124

    Year
    2012
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Guideline M
    Administrative Judge
    Richard A. Cronin, Jr.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Published Department of Energy hearing decisions. Descriptive, never a prediction about any pending case.