Skip to content
← Department of Energy hearings

Department of Energy · 10 CFR Part 710

Browse Department of Energy decisions

The published Energy Department hearing decisions. Filter by result, concern, or year. Reading a decision is free.

Two things to keep in mind about these numbers

These are hearing decisions only. The Energy Department resolves many cases without a hearing. What is here is the set that reached a hearing and produced a published decision, so it does not describe how the Energy Department decides cases overall.

A favorable decision is not the final word. In the Energy Department process a decision in the individual's favor can still be appealed by the agency, so a favorable result here is what the judge decided, not necessarily the settled outcome.

Department of Energy only

This list holds no DOHA cases, and no figure on this site adds the two records together. The words differ as well: a Department of Energy applicant receives a Notification Letter with a Summary of Security Concerns attached (not a Statement of Reasons), the government is represented by DOE Counsel (not Department Counsel), the rulebook is 10 CFR Part 710, and a review of the result is heard by the DOE Headquarters Appeal Panel. Results are favorable or not favorable to the individual, never granted or denied.

  • PSH-14-0072

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Robert B. Palmer
  • PSH-14-0081

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    William M. Schwartz
  • PSH-14-0037

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Not stated
  • PSH-14-0060

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Wade M. Boswell
  • PSH-14-0062

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not stated
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Steven L. Fine
  • PSH-14-0053

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman
  • PSH-14-0064

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Diane DeMoura
  • PSH-14-0056

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Diane DeMoura
  • PSH-14-0059

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Psychological conditions (I) · Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Shiwali G. Patel
  • PSH-14-0041

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Steven L. Fine
  • PSH-14-0033

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    William M. Schwartz
  • PSH-14-0014

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    William M. Schwartz
  • PSH-14-0032

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Diane DeMoura
  • PSH-13-0123

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman
  • PSH-13-0127

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Wade M. Boswell
  • PSH-13-0128

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Wade M. Boswell
  • PSH-13-0138

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Robert B. Palmer
  • PSH-13-0129

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman
  • PSH-13-0130

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Diane DeMoura
  • PSH-13-0125

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Richard A. Cronin, Jr.
  • PSH-13-0117

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Richard A. Cronin, Jr.
  • PSH-13-0111

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Not stated
  • PSH-13-0119

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Steven J. Goering
  • PSH-13-0100

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Psychological conditions (I) · Alcohol (G) · Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    William M. Schwartz
  • PSH-13-0110

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman
  • PSH-13-0112

    Year
    2014
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Psychological conditions (I) · Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Steven L. Fine

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Published Department of Energy hearing decisions. Descriptive, never a prediction about any pending case.