Department of Energy · 10 CFR Part 710
Browse Department of Energy decisions
Two things to keep in mind about these numbers
These are hearing decisions only. The Energy Department resolves many cases without a hearing. What is here is the set that reached a hearing and produced a published decision, so it does not describe how the Energy Department decides cases overall.
A favorable decision is not the final word. In the Energy Department process a decision in the individual's favor can still be appealed by the agency, so a favorable result here is what the judge decided, not necessarily the settled outcome.
Department of Energy only
This list holds no DOHA cases, and no figure on this site adds the two records together. The words differ as well: a Department of Energy applicant receives a Notification Letter with a Summary of Security Concerns attached (not a Statement of Reasons), the government is represented by DOE Counsel (not Department Counsel), the rulebook is 10 CFR Part 710, and a review of the result is heard by the DOE Headquarters Appeal Panel. Results are favorable or not favorable to the individual, never granted or denied.
Concern
35 decisions matching the filters. Clear the filters.
| Case | Year | Result | Concerns | Administrative Judge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSH-12-0090 | 2012 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) | Robert B. Palmer |
| PSH-12-0080 | 2012 | Favorable | Not stated | Diane DeMoura |
| PSH-12-0110 | 2012 | Favorable | Not stated | Diane DeMoura |
| PSH-12-0093 | 2012 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) | Wade M. Boswell |
| PSH-12-0088 | 2012 | Favorable | Not stated | Not stated |
| PSH-12-0083 | 2012 | Favorable | Personal conduct (E) · Guideline K · Guideline M | William M. Schwartz |
| PSH-12-0073 | 2012 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) · Criminal conduct (J) | Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman |
| PSH-12-0099 | 2012 | Favorable | Personal conduct (E) · Criminal conduct (J) | Diane DeMoura |
| PSH-12-0072 | 2012 | Favorable | Personal conduct (E) · Drug involvement (H) | Richard A. Cronin, Jr. |
| PSH-12-0079 | 2012 | Favorable | Not stated | Steven J. Goering |
| PSH-12-0081 | 2012 | Favorable | Not stated | William M. Schwartz |
| PSH-12-0060 | 2012 | Favorable | Personal conduct (E) · Guideline M | William M. Schwartz |
| PSH-12-0043 | 2012 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) | Richard A. Cronin, Jr. |
| PSH-12-0047 | 2012 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J) | Diane DeMoura |
| PSH-12-0065 | 2012 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) | Richard A. Cronin, Jr. |
| PSH-12-0045 | 2012 | Favorable | Drug involvement (H) · Guideline L | Steven L. Fine |
| PSH-12-0038 | 2012 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) | Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman |
| PSH-12-0042 | 2012 | Favorable | Financial considerations (F) | Steven L. Fine |
| PSH-12-0049 | 2012 | Favorable | Drug involvement (H) | Kent S. Woods |
| PSH-12-0031 | 2012 | Favorable | Drug involvement (H) | Robert B. Palmer |
| PSH-12-0005 | 2012 | Favorable | Guideline L | Not stated |
| PSH-12-0004 | 2012 | Favorable | Not stated | William M. Schwartz |
| PSH-12-0029 | 2012 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) | Diane DeMoura |
| PSH-12-0008 | 2012 | Favorable | Not stated | Kent S. Woods |
| PSH-11-0035 | 2012 | Favorable | Not stated | Richard A. Cronin, Jr. |
| TSO-1116 | 2012 | Favorable | Financial considerations (F) | Valerie Vance Adeyeye |
| PSH-11-0024 | 2012 | Favorable | Not stated | Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman |
| PSH-11-0029 | 2012 | Favorable | Financial considerations (F) | Robert B. Palmer |
| PSH-11-0034 | 2012 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) | Diane DeMoura |
| PSH-11-0019 | 2012 | Favorable | Criminal conduct (J) · Personal conduct (E) | William M. Schwartz |
| TSO-1103 | 2012 | Favorable | Criminal conduct (J) | Valerie Vance Adeyeye |
| PSH-11-0005 | 2012 | Favorable | Financial considerations (F) · Personal conduct (E) | Kent S. Woods |
| PSH-11-0018 | 2012 | Favorable | Criminal conduct (J) | Not stated |
| PSH-11-0008 | 2012 | Favorable | Criminal conduct (J) | Not stated |
| TSO-1107 | 2012 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) | Steven J. Goering |
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
- Administrative Judge
- Robert B. Palmer
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Diane DeMoura
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Diane DeMoura
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
- Administrative Judge
- Wade M. Boswell
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Not stated
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Personal conduct (E) · Guideline K · Guideline M
- Administrative Judge
- William M. Schwartz
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) · Criminal conduct (J)
- Administrative Judge
- Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Personal conduct (E) · Criminal conduct (J)
- Administrative Judge
- Diane DeMoura
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Personal conduct (E) · Drug involvement (H)
- Administrative Judge
- Richard A. Cronin, Jr.
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Steven J. Goering
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- William M. Schwartz
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Personal conduct (E) · Guideline M
- Administrative Judge
- William M. Schwartz
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G)
- Administrative Judge
- Richard A. Cronin, Jr.
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
- Administrative Judge
- Diane DeMoura
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G)
- Administrative Judge
- Richard A. Cronin, Jr.
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Drug involvement (H) · Guideline L
- Administrative Judge
- Steven L. Fine
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
- Administrative Judge
- Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Steven L. Fine
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Drug involvement (H)
- Administrative Judge
- Kent S. Woods
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Drug involvement (H)
- Administrative Judge
- Robert B. Palmer
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Guideline L
- Administrative Judge
- Not stated
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- William M. Schwartz
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G)
- Administrative Judge
- Diane DeMoura
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Kent S. Woods
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Richard A. Cronin, Jr.
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Valerie Vance Adeyeye
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Robert B. Palmer
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G)
- Administrative Judge
- Diane DeMoura
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Criminal conduct (J) · Personal conduct (E)
- Administrative Judge
- William M. Schwartz
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Criminal conduct (J)
- Administrative Judge
- Valerie Vance Adeyeye
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F) · Personal conduct (E)
- Administrative Judge
- Kent S. Woods
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Criminal conduct (J)
- Administrative Judge
- Not stated
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Criminal conduct (J)
- Administrative Judge
- Not stated
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G)
- Administrative Judge
- Steven J. Goering
Where to go from here
Get help with my case
Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.
Ask a question →I do this for clients
Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.
For attorneys and firms →Published Department of Energy hearing decisions. Descriptive, never a prediction about any pending case.