← Department of Energy hearings
Department of Energy · 10 CFR Part 710
Browse Department of Energy decisions
The published Energy Department hearing decisions. Filter by result, concern, or year. Reading a decision is free.
Two things to keep in mind about these numbers
These are hearing decisions only. The Energy Department resolves many cases without a hearing. What is here is the set that reached a hearing and produced a published decision, so it does not describe how the Energy Department decides cases overall.
A favorable decision is not the final word. In the Energy Department process a decision in the individual's favor can still be appealed by the agency, so a favorable result here is what the judge decided, not necessarily the settled outcome.
Department of Energy only
This list holds no DOHA cases, and no figure on this site adds the two records together. The words differ as well: a Department of Energy applicant receives a Notification Letter with a Summary of Security Concerns attached (not a Statement of Reasons), the government is represented by DOE Counsel (not Department Counsel), the rulebook is 10 CFR Part 710, and a review of the result is heard by the DOE Headquarters Appeal Panel. Results are favorable or not favorable to the individual, never granted or denied.
Concern
81 decisions matching the filters. Clear the filters.
| Case | Year | Result | Concerns | Administrative Judge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSH-12-0116 | 2012 | Not favorable | Not stated | Richard A. Cronin, Jr. |
| PSH-12-0113 | 2012 | Not favorable | Criminal conduct (J) · Guideline L | Steven L. Fine |
| PSH-12-0106 | 2012 | Not favorable | Not stated | Robert B. Palmer |
| PSH-12-0104 | 2012 | Not favorable | Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) | Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman |
| PSH-12-0096 | 2012 | Not favorable | Not stated | Not stated |
| PSH-12-0097 | 2012 | Not favorable | Not stated | Steven L. Fine |
| PSH-12-0095 | 2012 | Not favorable | Not stated | Steven J. Goering |
| PSH-12-0107 | 2012 | Not favorable | Financial considerations (F) | William M. Schwartz |
| PSH-12-0101 | 2012 | Not favorable | Financial considerations (F) | Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman |
| PSH-12-0089 | 2012 | Not favorable | Not stated | Robert B. Palmer |
| PSH-12-0100 | 2012 | Not favorable | Alcohol (G) | Steven J. Goering |
| PSH-12-0114 | 2012 | Not favorable | Financial considerations (F) | Diane DeMoura |
| PSH-12-0092 | 2012 | Not favorable | Not stated | Steven L. Fine |
| PSH-12-0085 | 2012 | Not favorable | Not stated | Steven J. Goering |
| PSH-12-0078 | 2012 | Not favorable | Financial considerations (F) | Not stated |
| PSH-12-0094 | 2012 | Not favorable | Alcohol (G) | Robert B. Palmer |
| PSH-12-0103 | 2012 | Not favorable | Financial considerations (F) | Wade M. Boswell |
| PSH-12-0074 | 2012 | Not favorable | Financial considerations (F) | Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman |
| PSH-12-0076 | 2012 | Not favorable | Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F) | Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman |
| PSH-12-0063 | 2012 | Not favorable | Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J) · Financial considerations (F) · Personal conduct (E) | William M. Schwartz |
| PSH-12-0077 | 2012 | Not favorable | Not stated | Steven J. Goering |
| PSH-12-0075 | 2012 | Not favorable | Financial considerations (F) | Wade M. Boswell |
| PSH-12-0057 | 2012 | Not favorable | Personal conduct (E) · Criminal conduct (J) · Financial considerations (F) | Not stated |
| PSH-12-0082 | 2012 | Not favorable | Not stated | Robert B. Palmer |
| PSH-12-0071 | 2012 | Not favorable | Personal conduct (E) · Guideline M | Steven L. Fine |
| PSH-12-0052 | 2012 | Not favorable | Not stated | Steven J. Goering |
| PSH-12-0068 | 2012 | Not favorable | Drug involvement (H) · Criminal conduct (J) · Guideline L | Steven L. Fine |
| PSH-12-0059 | 2012 | Not favorable | Not stated | Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman |
| PSH-12-0066 | 2012 | Not favorable | Alcohol (G) · Personal conduct (E) | Richard A. Cronin, Jr. |
| PSH-12-0069 | 2012 | Not favorable | Not stated | Not stated |
| PSH-12-0055 | 2012 | Not favorable | Not stated | Robert B. Palmer |
| PSH-12-0039 | 2012 | Not favorable | Not stated | Ann S. Augustyn |
| PSH-12-0048 | 2012 | Not favorable | Not stated | William M. Schwartz |
| PSH-12-0025 | 2012 | Not favorable | Not stated | Steven J. Goering |
| PSH-12-0046 | 2012 | Not favorable | Alcohol (G) · Drug involvement (H) · Psychological conditions (I) | William M. Schwartz |
| PSH-12-0053 | 2012 | Not favorable | Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F) | Diane DeMoura |
| PSH-12-0035 | 2012 | Not favorable | Financial considerations (F) · Personal conduct (E) | David M. Petrush |
| PSH-12-0027 | 2012 | Not favorable | Financial considerations (F) | Richard A. Cronin, Jr. |
| PSH-12-0050 | 2012 | Not favorable | Psychological conditions (I) · Personal conduct (E) · Criminal conduct (J) | Kent S. Woods |
| PSH-12-0044 | 2012 | Not favorable | Financial considerations (F) | Richard A. Cronin, Jr. |
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Richard A. Cronin, Jr.
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Criminal conduct (J) · Guideline L
- Administrative Judge
- Steven L. Fine
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Robert B. Palmer
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
- Administrative Judge
- Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Not stated
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Steven L. Fine
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Steven J. Goering
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- William M. Schwartz
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Robert B. Palmer
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G)
- Administrative Judge
- Steven J. Goering
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Diane DeMoura
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Steven L. Fine
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Steven J. Goering
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Not stated
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G)
- Administrative Judge
- Robert B. Palmer
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Wade M. Boswell
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J) · Financial considerations (F) · Personal conduct (E)
- Administrative Judge
- William M. Schwartz
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Steven J. Goering
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Wade M. Boswell
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Personal conduct (E) · Criminal conduct (J) · Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Not stated
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Robert B. Palmer
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Personal conduct (E) · Guideline M
- Administrative Judge
- Steven L. Fine
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Steven J. Goering
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Drug involvement (H) · Criminal conduct (J) · Guideline L
- Administrative Judge
- Steven L. Fine
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G) · Personal conduct (E)
- Administrative Judge
- Richard A. Cronin, Jr.
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Not stated
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Robert B. Palmer
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Ann S. Augustyn
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- William M. Schwartz
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Steven J. Goering
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G) · Drug involvement (H) · Psychological conditions (I)
- Administrative Judge
- William M. Schwartz
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Diane DeMoura
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F) · Personal conduct (E)
- Administrative Judge
- David M. Petrush
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Richard A. Cronin, Jr.
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Psychological conditions (I) · Personal conduct (E) · Criminal conduct (J)
- Administrative Judge
- Kent S. Woods
- Year
- 2012
- Result
- Not favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Richard A. Cronin, Jr.
Where to go from here
Get help with my case
Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.
Ask a question →I do this for clients
Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.
For attorneys and firms →Published Department of Energy hearing decisions. Descriptive, never a prediction about any pending case.