Skip to content
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline G · Alcohol

Alcohol Use Disorder Diagnosed

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does alcohol use disorder diagnosed affect a security clearance?

Alcohol Use Disorder Diagnosed is an issue decided under Guideline G, Alcohol. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 758 hearing-level cases, and 26% of the 755 decided ended with access granted (198 granted, 557 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 755 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

758

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

26%

198 granted · 557 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions cited

The formal mitigating conditions the case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted and in cases that were denied. Each is shown with its paragraph number and a plain name. Read what each condition says.
  • ¶ 23(b) · The pattern acknowledged, with modified use or abstinence established

    In granted cases
    54
    In denied cases
    11
  • ¶ 23(a) · So much time has passed, or the incidents were so infrequent

    In granted cases
    37
    In denied cases
    5
  • ¶ 23(c) · In counseling or treatment, with satisfactory progress

    In granted cases
    30
    In denied cases
    4
  • ¶ 23(d) · Treatment and aftercare completed, with abstinence established

    In granted cases
    29
    In denied cases
    3

Circumstances credited in granted cases

The specific circumstances the judge expressly credited among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted.
  • abstinence period documented · credited in 2 granted cases
  • substance treatment completed · credited in 2 granted cases
  • rehabilitation evidence · credited in 1 granted case

Recent decided examples

  • This case involves security concerns regarding the applicant's alcohol consumption, drug involvement, psychological conditions, and personal conduct. The applicant admitted to several allegations rela…

  • Applicant, a defense contractor employee, was granted a clearance under Guideline G. The SOR alleged long term excessive alcohol use, current vodka consumption, two alcohol related arrests in 2008 and…

  • The case involves an applicant seeking security clearance who faced allegations under Guidelines I, G, and E, primarily related to psychological conditions, alcohol consumption, and personal conduct. …

  • The case involves an applicant seeking security clearance who has a history of alcohol dependency and related incidents. The applicant admitted to several allegations regarding past treatment for alco…

See all 758 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline G

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.