Skip to content
CASE
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline J · Criminal Conduct

Theft or Larceny

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does theft or larceny affect a security clearance?

Theft or Larceny is an issue decided under Guideline J, Criminal Conduct. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 431 hearing-level cases, and 21% of the 431 decided ended with access granted (92 granted, 339 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 431 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

431

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

21%

92 granted · 339 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions cited

The formal mitigating conditions the case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted and in cases that were denied. Each is shown with its paragraph number and a plain name. Read what each condition says.

  • ¶ 32(a) · So much time has passed, or the circumstances were so unusual

    In granted cases
    49
    In denied cases
    21

  • ¶ 32(d) · Successful rehabilitation shown

    In granted cases
    29
    In denied cases
    10

  • ¶ 32(c) · No reliable evidence that the person committed the offense

    In granted cases
    28
    In denied cases
    12

  • ¶ 32(b) · The person acted under pressure that is unlikely to recur

    In granted cases
    18
    In denied cases
    2

Circumstances credited in granted cases

The specific circumstances the judge expressly credited among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted.
  • rehabilitation evidence · credited in 11 granted cases
  • acknowledgment and remorse · credited in 10 granted cases
  • no subsequent offenses · credited in 9 granted cases
  • passage of time · credited in 4 granted cases
  • explanation of omission credible · credited in 3 granted cases

Recent decided examples

  • ISCR Case No. 24-01085Granted2026

    Applicant, a defense contractor quality assurance program manager and Navy veteran, faced allegations under Guidelines J, E, and H involving decades of criminal conduct, traffic offenses, workplace di…

  • ISCR Case No. 24-00204Granted2025

    The applicant in this case was a 44-year-old individual seeking a security clearance for employment with a Department of Defense contractor. The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA) addressed…

  • ISCR Case No. 25-00933Denied2026

    Applicant, a defense contractor and former Marine reservist, faced allegations under Guidelines E, G, H, and J based on a long history of alcohol related incidents, DUI convictions, drug use, criminal…

  • ISCR Case No. 24-02357Denied2026

    Applicant, a 55 year old IT technician, was denied a security clearance after the judge found a long history of serious criminal conduct, including drug trafficking, weapons offenses, and a 16 year fe…

See all 431 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline J

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.