Found 5,796 matching decisions — showing 51–100.
Decided public cases — descriptive, never a prediction.
The applicant, a 54-year-old defense contractor employee, successfully mitigated financial concerns related to his security clearance application. Despite previous bankruptcies and delinquent accounts, he demonstrated a commitment to resolving his financial issues, leading to a favorable decision fo...
The judge found that the applicant had significant financial issues, including unpaid federal taxes for tax years 2013 and 2014, and three bankruptcies filed in 1998, 2009, and 2016. The applicant failed to mitigate the security concerns associated with these financial issues, leading to a denial of...
The judge found that the applicant has not mitigated the financial considerations security concerns, resulting in a denial of eligibility for access to classified information. The applicant's history of delinquent debts, including a failed Chapter 13 bankruptcy, and ongoing financial irresponsibilit...
The judge found multiple financial concerns under Guideline F, including a mortgage delinquency and several collection accounts. The applicant's financial issues were attributed to past unemployment and personal circumstances, but ultimately, the judge ruled against the applicant on most allegations...
The judge found that the applicant mitigated the financial concerns under Guideline F, which included multiple bankruptcy filings. The applicant demonstrated that her financial problems were largely beyond her control and that she has taken steps to resolve her remaining tax debts, leading to a dete...
The judge found that the applicant had significant financial issues, including six debts totaling $14,277 and a bankruptcy discharge in 2000. However, the applicant demonstrated efforts to manage his finances, including working with a credit counseling service and filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, wh...
The judge found for the applicant on all allegations under Guideline E, concluding that the applicant did not deliberately fail to disclose required information on his security clearance application. The applicant's financial conduct and personal issues were considered in the context of his overall ...
The judge found in favor of the applicant on all allegations under Guideline E, concluding that the applicant's personal conduct did not raise security concerns. The applicant's responses to the allegations were deemed credible, and the judge accepted the applicant's explanations regarding the omiss...
The judge found significant financial concerns under Guideline F due to the applicant's history of multiple bankruptcies and unresolved debts totaling nearly $10,000. The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to mitigate these concerns, resulting in a denial of security clearance.
The judge found that the applicant failed to mitigate financial concerns under Guideline F, primarily due to a history of significant debts discharged in bankruptcy and unresolved financial obligations. While some debts, specifically federal and state tax liens, were resolved, the applicant's overal...
The judge found that the applicant's financial issues stemmed from circumstances largely beyond her control, including medical problems and a spouse's irresponsible financial behavior. The applicant's debts, totaling $34,352, were mitigated by her ongoing bankruptcy process, which would discharge he...
The judge found that the applicant had significant financial issues, including a Chapter 7 bankruptcy and multiple delinquent debts totaling over $155,000. While some debts were resolved, the applicant's overall financial history raised security concerns, leading to a denial of the security clearanc...
The judge found that the applicant's financial concerns were mitigated, leading to a decision to grant her security clearance. The applicant disputed a significant debt to the Social Security Administration, which was under review, and her previous debts had been discharged through bankruptcy.
The judge found against the applicant on all allegations under Guideline E, Personal Conduct. The applicant was determined to have falsified material facts regarding his financial obligations on his security clearance application. The applicant failed to mitigate the personal conduct concerns, leadi...
The applicant, who represented himself, faced security clearance denial due to financial issues, including failure to file tax returns for 2020 and 2021, and a history of multiple bankruptcies. Despite admitting to all allegations, he did not provide sufficient evidence of responsible actions to mit...
The applicant, a 58-year-old defense contractor employee, successfully mitigated financial concerns related to his security clearance application. He admitted to all allegations regarding financial difficulties stemming from a failed business venture. Despite multiple bankruptcy filings, he demonstr...
The applicant, a 57-year-old software developer, faced security clearance denial due to unresolved financial issues, including multiple bankruptcies and significant debts. Despite some admissions, the applicant's financial management raised concerns about reliability and trustworthiness. The adminis...
The applicant mitigated personal conduct concerns but failed to mitigate financial considerations. He admitted to multiple financial delinquencies, including significant tax debts and a Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The administrative judge concluded that the applicant's financial issues raised doubts abou...
The applicant, who represented herself, faced allegations under Guideline F regarding financial considerations, including multiple bankruptcies and significant medical debt totaling $18,463. The administrative judge found against the applicant, concluding that her financial history raised concerns a...
The judge found against the applicant on the personal conduct allegations under Guideline E, specifically regarding the deliberate falsification of his e-QIP by failing to disclose significant debts. The applicant's lack of candor during the security clearance process contributed to the denial of hi...
The judge found multiple financial concerns under Guideline F, including numerous delinquent debts and a history of financial mismanagement. While some debts were resolved through bankruptcy, the applicant's overall financial irresponsibility led to a denial of his security clearance.
The judge found that the applicant had filed for bankruptcy three times due to financial difficulties stemming from personal circumstances, including divorce and economic distress. Despite these challenges, the applicant demonstrated efforts to manage her finances responsibly, leading to a favorable...
The judge found that the applicant had mitigated the financial concerns raised under Guideline F, primarily due to her ongoing Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan and her efforts to manage her debts. The applicant's financial situation was deemed to be in order, leading to the granting of her security cleara...
The applicant has a history of financial difficulties, including two Chapter 7 bankruptcies and significant unpaid state and federal taxes. The judge found that the applicant failed to mitigate the security concerns stemming from these financial issues, resulting in a denial of the security clearanc...
The judge found against the applicant on both allegations under Guideline E, citing questionable judgment and untrustworthiness due to past conduct, including a DUI and a felonious assault charge. The applicant's failure to demonstrate mitigation led to the denial of his security clearance.
The applicant's eligibility for a public trust position was denied due to insufficient evidence to mitigate trustworthiness concerns primarily related to financial issues. The applicant admitted to several allegations, including two Chapter 7 bankruptcies and a federal income tax debt. Despite some ...
The case involves allegations against an applicant for a public trust position, primarily concerning criminal conduct and financial considerations. The applicant was found to have committed theft of government property and has unresolved debts. While some personal conduct allegations were resolved f...
The case involves security concerns under Guideline F (Financial Considerations) due to the applicant's history of multiple bankruptcy filings and ongoing financial difficulties. The applicant admitted to the allegations and cited personal circumstances, including raising three children and periods ...
The applicant, a disabled veteran with two prior bankruptcies, faced security clearance denial due to unresolved debts totaling approximately $20,000. Despite her military service and claims of financial mismanagement due to identity theft and family issues, she failed to provide sufficient evidence...
The applicant, who has filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy five times from 1989 to 2017, was denied security clearance due to unresolved financial concerns. Despite admitting to the allegations, including a delinquent credit card account and significant unsecured debts, the applicant failed to demonstra...
The applicant, a 61-year-old defense contractor employee, was denied security clearance due to unresolved financial issues, including nine delinquent accounts totaling approximately $29,338. Despite filing for bankruptcy, the applicant failed to demonstrate a responsible approach to managing her deb...
The judge found that the applicant had a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case pending and owed a medical collection debt of $4,863. However, both debts were ultimately ruled as mitigated, leading to a decision to grant the applicant's security clearance.
The judge found significant financial concerns under Guideline F, including debts related to state income taxes, failure to file tax returns, and delinquent property taxes. Ultimately, the judge ruled against the applicant on two of the four allegations, leading to a denial of the security clearance...
The judge found that the applicant's financial issues stemmed from circumstances largely beyond his control, including a decline in real estate values and tenant payment failures. The applicant's efforts to address his debts through a Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan and consistent payments were deemed su...
The judge found multiple financial concerns under Guideline F, including numerous delinquent debts totaling $52,367 and a Chapter 7 bankruptcy discharge in December 2008. The judge ruled against the applicant on most allegations, citing ongoing financial issues and a lack of sufficient evidence to d...
The judge found that the applicant mitigated personal conduct concerns but did not mitigate financial considerations security concerns. As a result, the applicant's eligibility for access to classified information was denied.
The judge found significant financial concerns under Guideline F, noting that the applicant owed a total of $37,386 in delinquent debts, including utility, medical, and student loan debts. While the applicant had made some efforts to address her debts through a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, the judge ultim...
The judge found that the applicant had a history of financial delinquency, including a Chapter 7 bankruptcy discharge and a reaffirmed car loan debt that led to repossession. The applicant's financial issues were deemed unmitigated, resulting in a denial of the security clearance.
The judge found against the applicant on all allegations under Guideline E, concluding that the applicant deliberately failed to disclose relevant financial information on his security clearance application. The applicant's lack of candor and failure to report his financial difficulties were signifi...
The applicant, a 46-year-old defense contractor employee, was denied security clearance due to unresolved financial issues, including multiple bankruptcies and a history of financial mismanagement. Despite admitting to the allegations, he failed to demonstrate a credible plan for resolving his debts...
The applicant, with a history of financial instability, faced denial of security clearance due to three Chapter 7 bankruptcies filed in 1996, 2011, and 2019. Despite efforts to improve her financial situation, including education and employment, the applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient financi...
The judge found multiple financial concerns under Guideline F, including a history of bankruptcies and unpaid debts. While some debts were disputed and found to be not the applicant's responsibility, the overall financial situation was deemed insufficiently mitigated, leading to a denial of the secu...
The judge found against the applicant on several financial allegations, including significant tax liabilities and unsecured debts. Although the applicant received a Chapter 7 bankruptcy discharge, the judge determined that the applicant's ongoing financial issues raised security concerns, leading to...
The judge found against the applicant on all financial allegations under Guideline F, citing a history of delinquent debts totaling $28,978 and a Chapter 13 bankruptcy filing. The applicant admitted responsibility for the debts but failed to demonstrate sufficient progress in addressing them, leadin...
The judge found multiple financial concerns under Guideline F, including numerous delinquent debts and a history of bankruptcy filings. The applicant's financial issues were deemed significant enough to deny his security clearance, despite some debts being included in bankruptcy petitions and a few ...
The judge found multiple financial concerns under Guideline F, including a Chapter 7 bankruptcy and several delinquent debts totaling $22,183. Ultimately, the judge ruled against the applicant on all financial allegations, citing ongoing concerns about her financial judgment and stability.
The judge found that the applicant had several financial issues, including unresolved debts and a history of delinquent payments. However, the applicant's financial problems were largely attributed to circumstances beyond his control, such as unemployment and caring for an ill spouse, and he demonst...
The judge found multiple financial concerns under Guideline F, including numerous delinquent debts, tax liens, and bankruptcies. Ultimately, the judge ruled against the applicant, concluding that the financial issues raised significant security concerns that were not mitigated.
The judge found that the applicant's financial issues, primarily stemming from her husband's medical problems and unemployment, were resolved through multiple bankruptcy filings. The applicant demonstrated responsible behavior in addressing her debts, leading to a decision in her favor regarding fin...
The judge found that the applicant had significant financial issues, including multiple bankruptcies and delinquent student loans. Ultimately, the applicant's financial considerations were deemed insufficiently mitigated, leading to a denial of the security clearance.
Applicant filed for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy in about November 1996, discharged in about November 2001.
Applicant filed for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy in about November 2001, discharged in about October 2005.
Applicant filed for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy in about June 2008, dismissed in about October 2012.
Applicant filed for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy in about May 2013, dismissed in about October 2014.
Applicant filed for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy in about February 2016, dismissed in about June 2018.
Applicant filed for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy in about September 2018, dismissed in about June 2020.
Applicant voluntarily filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 13 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
Applicant's new bankruptcy attorney purportedly followed the Chapter 11 bankruptcy process, but at one point suggested to Applicant that they should convert th…
Applicant filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code in about November 2004, and his debts were discharged in about June 2006.
Applicant filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code in about January 2008, and his bankruptcy was dismissed in about December 2009.
Applicant filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code in about May 2015, and his bankruptcy was dismissed in about February 2016.
Applicant filed Chapter 13 bankruptcy in July 2016.
Applicant filed for a Chapter 13 bankruptcy in approximately March 1997 that was converted to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy in October 2000 and then discharged in Mar…
Applicant filed in December 2007 for a Chapter 13 bankruptcy that was voluntarily dismissed in February 2011.
Applicant filed for a Chapter 7 bankruptcy in February 2011 that was discharged in June 2011.
Chapter 7 bankruptcy of July 2013, discharged November 2013
Chapter 7 bankruptcy of August 2021, discharged January 2022
On or about May 22, 2023, Applicant filed for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy and as of the date of the SOR, this bankruptcy is in process.
In November 2021, she filed for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy. She listed over $11,000 in unsecured claims.
In November 2017, Applicant filed Chapter 7 Bankruptcy and this bankruptcy was discharged in March 2018.
In June 2017, Applicant filed Chapter 13 Bankruptcy and this bankruptcy was dismissed in October 2017.
Applicant has two prior bankruptcies, in 2000 and 2014.
Applicant admitted some SOR debts and denied others, but largely claimed that many of the SOR debts were listed in the 2014 bankruptcy.
Applicant denies the debt, and claims it was part of her bankruptcy.
Applicant admitted the debt in her answer and claimed it was part of her bankruptcy.
Applicant admitted the debt in her answer and claimed it was part of her bankruptcy.
Applicant asserted that the debt was resolved in bankruptcy and was sold to another creditor.
Applicant asserted that the debt was resolved in bankruptcy and was sold to another creditor.
Applicant has filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy protection on five occasions from 1989 to 2017.
Applicant's November 2010 Chapter 13 bankruptcy claimed $64,377 in unsecured non-priority debts, primarily student loans and other unsecured loans.
Applicant filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy relief in September 2005, claiming $20,928 in unsecured non-priority debts.
Applicant first filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy in 1989, which was converted to Chapter 7 and discharged in August 1995.
Applicant has a history of financial difficulties going back over a decade that have resulted in many accounts becoming delinquent.
The SOR alleged two Chapter 7 bankruptcies (October 2010 and May 2019), as well as seven Chapter 13 bankruptcies between December 2010 and January 2016.
Applicant has a long history of delinquent debts and financial instability, as evidenced by the three Chapter 7 bankruptcies alleged in the SOR, in 1996, 2011,…
Applicant filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in May 2011 after seeking advice on how to save her home from foreclosure. In that bankruptcy petition, she disclosed …
In May 2019, Applicant refiled for bankruptcy under Chapter 7, reporting about $488,000 in liabilities, of which over $384,000 were student loans.