A decided public DOHA case, shown for research, not advice or a prediction.
ISCR Case No. 16-02733.h1
GrantedDecided Feb 14, 2018 · Administrative Judge Francisco Mendez · Hearing
Case headnote
Summary
The applicant, a cleared federal employee, faced financial difficulties due to a failed business and subsequent unemployment, leading to bankruptcy and delinquent debts. After obtaining employment in 2013, he took proactive steps to resolve his financial issues, including financial counseling and establishing payment plans. The judge found that the applicant's current financial situation did not pose a security concern, leading to a favorable decision under Guideline F.
Why the applicant prevailed
- The applicant took responsible actions to resolve his financial issues, including obtaining financial counseling and establishing payment plans.
- He self-reported his financial problems and demonstrated a commitment to addressing them.
- Recent credit reports indicated timely bill payments and a good credit score over 700.
Conditions referenced
Mitigating
- AG ¶ 20(a) The behavior was not recent and was caused or exacerbated by circumstances beyond the person's control.applied
- AG ¶ 20(b) The individual has received counseling or treatment for the problem.applied
- AG ¶ 20(c) The individual has initiated a good-faith effort to repay overdue creditors or otherwise resolve debts.applied
- AG ¶ 20(d) The individual has a track record of responsible financial behavior.applied
Key rule quoted
“In evaluating the security concern at issue, I considered the applicable disqualifying and mitigating conditions, as well as the whole-person concept.”
Procedural posture
- SOR issued
- 10/29/2016
- Answer filed
- Hearing held
- 12/14/2017
- Decision date
- 02/14/2018 Judge informed parties of summary disposition.
Cite for
- Mitigating Conditions Under Guideline F for Financial Considerations
- Importance of Proactive Measures in Resolving Financial Issues
- Consideration of Whole-person Concept in Security Clearance Decisions
Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.
From the decision
Facts this decision states, each with the sentence it comes from. Descriptive of the record, not an assessment.
- Prior Clearance
- held
- Payment Plan
- yes
- Bankruptcy
- discharged
Allegations under Guideline F
Reading the 3 per allegation rows needs a free account.
3 rows in this decision.
It opens the per allegation record on every guideline: the amounts, the findings, and the sentence behind each row.
Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case. The verbatim source decision is below.
Full decision
Open original PDFThe complete official text, footnotes and signatures included, is in the original PDF.
Decision text, by section
Appearances
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEFENSE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS
In the matter of: ) ) REDACTED ) ISCR Case No. 16-02733 ) ) Applicant for Security Clearance
For Government: Erin P. Thompson, Esq., Department Counsel For Applicant: Pro se
02/14/2018 ______________
Summary Decision ______________
MENDEZ, Francisco, Administrative Judge:
On October 29, 2016, the Department of Defense (DoD) sent Applicant a Statement of Reasons (SOR) alleging security concerns under the financial considerations guideline. Applicant answered the SOR and requested a hearing. A hearing was held on December 14, 2017. Applicant testified and both parties submitted exhibits for the record. Applicant timely submitted additional evidence post-hearing.
On February 12, 2018, after reviewing all the evidence, I informed the parties that the case appeared appropriate for summary disposition in Applicant’s favor. Department Counsel did not object. (Appellate Exhibit I.)
Findings of Fact and Analysis
Applicant started experiencing financial trouble in 2009, when the small business he had opened a few years earlier failed. He was forced to declare bankruptcy to resolve his business-related debt. Before starting the business, Applicant had worked for many years as a cleared federal employee and contractor. He opened a business in the alternate energy field in State A after his wife’s doctors informed them that her medical condition would be helped if they lived in a warmer climate near the ocean. Applicant, like many others during the recession, was unable to attain gainful employment for many years. He worked low-paying jobs (fast food chain restaurants and large retail stores) to pay his bills, including the high premiums for his wife’s medical insurance. He also withdrew money from his 401(k) retirement account to pay for everyday living expenses. He incurred delinquent debt, including tax-related debt.
In 2013, Applicant was hired by his current employer. He immediately began to address and resolve his delinquent debts. He submitted documentation showing that he received financial counseling and hired a certified public accounting firm, which helped him file overdue tax returns and establish payment plans to satisfy his tax debts. He either paid or is paying his debts. He self-reported the information about his financial issues. Recent credit reports reflect that Applicant pays his bills on time. The credit reports also reflect a good credit score (over 700).
Accordingly, the record evidence reflects that Applicant’s past financial problems were caused or exacerbated by matters beyond his control. He provided documentation showing that he took responsible action to resolve his financial issues and, though he is still in the process of regaining his financial footing, his current financial situation does not raise a security concern. Additionally, the evidence reflects a favorable security record and several work and community references commented favorably about Applicant’s reliability, trustworthiness, extensive volunteer work, and overall good character.
In evaluating the security concern at issue, I considered the applicable disqualifying and mitigating conditions, as well as the whole-person concept. Specifically, I find that the mitigating conditions found in the National Security Adjudicative Guidelines ¶¶ 20(a) – 20(d) apply.1
Formal Findings
Paragraph 1, Guideline F (Financial Considerations): FOR APPLICANT
Subparagraphs 1.a – 1.c: For Applicant
Conclusion
In light of the record evidence, it is clearly consistent with the interests of national security to grant Applicant initial or continued eligibility for access to classified information. Applicant’s request for a security clearance is granted.
____________________ Francisco Mendez Administrative Judge
Footnotes
1 The guidelines became effective on June 8, 2017, through Security Executive Agent Directive 4. The guidelines are incorporated into the current version of DoD Directive 5220.6, Defense Industrial Personnel Security Clearance Review Program, and are publically available on the DOHA website.