A decided public DOHA case, shown for research, not advice or a prediction.
ISCR Case No. 15-02213.h1
GrantedDecided Nov 25, 2016 · Administrative Judge Francisco Mendez · Hearing
Case headnote
Summary
The applicant, a pro se individual, faced security concerns under Guideline F due to past financial issues primarily caused by unstable employment and his wife's serious medical condition. He successfully mitigated these concerns by demonstrating responsible financial management and resolving most debts, leading to a favorable decision for security clearance.
Why the applicant prevailed
- Applicant's financial problems were primarily due to circumstances beyond his control, including unstable employment and his wife's cancer diagnosis.
- He resolved most of the debts listed in the SOR, except for one, which he is paying off through a payment plan.
- Applicant demonstrated responsible financial management by reducing expenses and maintaining stable employment.
Conditions referenced
Mitigating
- AG ¶ 20(a) The behavior was not recent.applied
- AG ¶ 20(b) The conditions that resulted in the behavior were beyond the person's control.applied
- AG ¶ 20(c) The person has received counseling or treatment for the problem.rejected
- AG ¶ 20(d) The person has established a good track record of financial responsibility.applied
Key rule quoted
“The security concerns over Applicant’s history of financial problems do not create doubt about his current reliability, trustworthiness, good judgment, and ability to protect classified information.”
Procedural posture
- SOR issued
- December 8, 2015
- Answer filed
- Hearing held
- September 22, 2016
- Decision date
- November 25, 2016
Cite for
- Mitigation of Financial Issues Under Guideline F Due to Circumstances Beyond Control
- Demonstrating Responsible Financial Management as a Basis for Granting Clearance
- The Importance of Stable Employment and Personal Circumstances in Financial Evaluations
Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.
From the decision
Facts this decision states, each with the sentence it comes from. Descriptive of the record, not an assessment.
- Payment Plan
- yes
- Bankruptcy
- none
Allegations under Guideline F
Reading the 2 per allegation rows needs a free account.
2 rows in this decision.
It opens the per allegation record on every guideline: the amounts, the findings, and the sentence behind each row.
Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case. The verbatim source decision is below.
Full decision
Open original PDFThe complete official text, footnotes and signatures included, is in the original PDF.
Decision text, by section
Appearances
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEFENSE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS
In the matter of: ) ) REDACTED ) ISCR Case No. 15-02213 ) ) Applicant for Security Clearance
For Government: Candace L. Garcia, Esq., Department Counsel For Applicant: Pro se
11/25/2016 ______________
Decision
______________
MENDEZ, Francisco, Administrative Judge:
On December 8, 2015, the Department of Defense (DOD) Consolidated Adjudications Facility (CAF) sent Applicant a Statement of Reasons (SOR) alleging that his circumstances raised security concerns under the financial considerations guideline.1 Applicant answered the SOR and requested a hearing to establish his eligibility for access to classified information.
On September 22, 2016, I convened a hearing. After receipt of the transcript and the record closed, I provided written notice to the parties of my intent to resolve the case through a summary disposition in Applicant’s favor. Department Counsel indicated that the Government did not object to my proposed resolution of the matter in this fashion. See Appellate Exhibit I.
Applicant mitigated security concerns raised by his past financial problems and met his heavy burden of persuasion for access to classified information. His past financial problems were primarily attributable to matters beyond his control, namely, periods of unstable employment and his wife's serious medical issue (cancer). After falling behind on some debts, Applicant attempted to modify his mortgage. The creditor kept changing hands and losing his modification paperwork, exacerbating his already troubled financial situation. Applicant satisfied his delinquent home mortgage through an agreed-upon short sale. As of the close of the record, Applicant had satisfied or otherwise resolved all the SOR debts, except the debt listed in SOR 1.h. He has been paying this debt through an agreed-upon payment plan that was established in about December 2015. He has been making consistent monthly payments and will finish paying off the debt in less than one year.
In addition to responsibly addressing the SOR debts, Applicant also demonstrated that he currently manages his finances in a responsible manner. Notably, he reduced his expenses by moving from his home to a modest apartment with a monthly rental cost that is nearly half his previous monthly mortgage payments. His children have all moved out of the house except for his one minor child. This change in circumstances has permitted Applicant to further reduce his monthly expenses. His current job situation is stable. His wife has returned to full-time employment, and her cancer is in full remission. Applicant and his wife together earn nearly $200,000. After a thorough review of the record evidence, I find that the mitigating conditions listed at AG ¶¶ 20(a) – 20(d) apply.
The security concerns over Applicant’s history of financial problems do not create doubt about his current reliability, trustworthiness, good judgment, and ability to protect classified information. In reaching this conclusion, I weighed the evidence as a whole and considered if the favorable evidence outweighed the unfavorable evidence or vice versa. I also gave due consideration to the whole-person concept. Accordingly, I conclude that Applicant met his burden of persuasion to show that it is clearly consistent with the national interest to grant him eligibility for access to classified information. Applicant’s request for a security clearance is granted.
____________________ Francisco Mendez Administrative Judge
Footnotes
1 This action was taken under Executive Order (E.O.) 10865, Safeguarding Classified Information within Industry (February 20, 1960), as amended; Department of Defense Directive 5220.6, Defense Industrial Personnel Security Clearance Review Program (January 2, 1992), as amended (Directive); and the Adjudicative Guidelines (AG) implemented by the Department of Defense on September 1, 2006.