Skip to content
← Back to results

A decided public DOHA case, shown for research, not advice or a prediction.

ISCR Case No. 10-08478.h1

Denied

Decided May 7, 2012 · Administrative Judge James F. Duffy · Hearing

Case headnote

Summary

The applicant, a pro se individual, faced security concerns under Guideline F (Financial Considerations) due to unresolved financial issues. The judge determined that the applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to mitigate these concerns, resulting in a denial of security clearance.

Why the applicant was denied

  • The applicant did not demonstrate a consistent pattern of financial responsibility.
  • The applicant failed to provide evidence of a plan to resolve outstanding debts.

Conditions referenced

Disqualifying

  • F.1 Inability to satisfy debtsraised
  • F.2 Delinquent accountsraised

Procedural posture

SOR issued
January 11, 2012
Answer filed
Hearing held
Decision date
05/07/2012

Cite for

  • Failure to Mitigate Financial Concerns Under Guideline F
  • Importance of Demonstrating Financial Responsibility
  • Impact of Unresolved Debts on Security Clearance Eligibility

Editorial summary generated for research. Not legal advice; not a prediction. Verify against the full decision before relying on any quoted language.

From the decision

Facts this decision states, each with the sentence it comes from. Descriptive of the record, not an assessment.

Allegations under Guideline F

Reading the 4 per allegation rows needs a free account.

4 rows in this decision.

It opens the per allegation record on every guideline: the amounts, the findings, and the sentence behind each row.

Descriptive standardized rendering of a decided public case. The verbatim source decision is below.

Full decision

Open original PDF

The complete official text, footnotes and signatures included, is in the original PDF.

Decision text, by section

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEFENSE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS

In the matter of: ) ) ) ISCR Case No. 10-08478 ) Applicant for Security Clearance )

Appearances

For Government: Fahryn Hoffman, Esq., Department Counsel For Applicant: Pro se

05/07/2012 __________

Decision

__________

DUFFY, James F., Administrative Judge:

Applicant failed to mitigate the security concerns arising under Guideline F (Financial Considerations). Eligibility for access to classified information is denied.

Statement of the Case

On March 12, 2009, Applicant submitted a security clearance application (SCA). On January 11, 2012, the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA) issued Applicant a Statement of Reasons (SOR) detailing security concerns under Guideline F. DOHA acted under Executive Order 10865, Safeguarding Classified Information Within Industry, dated February 20, 1960, as amended; Department of Defense Directive 5220.6, Defense Industrial Personnel Security Clearance Review Program, dated January 2, 1992, as amended (Directive); and the adjudicative guidelines (AG) implemented on September 1, 2006.