A decided public DOHA case, shown for research, not advice or a prediction.
ISCR Case No. 03-26213
Appeal BoardDecided Aug 23, 2006 · Administrative Judge Michael Y. Ra'anan · Appeal
Appeal at a glance
The appeal involved a denial of a security clearance based on financial considerations under Guideline F. The applicant argued that the Administrative Judge erred in concluding that the security concerns had not been mitigated. The Board affirmed the decision, finding the Judge's conclusions sustainable based on the evidence presented.
Descriptive structured reading of this decided, public Appeal Board decision: what the case says, not a prediction or advice.
Full decision
Open original PDFThe complete official text, footnotes and signatures included, is in the original PDF.
Decision text, by section
Appearances
RONG></SPAN></P>
<P STYLE="text-align: CENTER"><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"><STRONG><EM>Pro Se</EM></STRONG></SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-size: 11pt"></SPAN></P>
<P>The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA) declined to grant Applicant a security clearance. On March 3, 2005, DOHA issued a statement of
reasons (SOR) advising Applicant of the basis for that decision--security concerns raised under Guideline F (Financial Considerations) of Department of
Defense
Order
ive Judge</SPAN></P>
<P>Chairman, Appeal Board</SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration: underline">