A decided public DOHA case, shown for research, not advice or a prediction.
ISCR Case No. 04-07831
Appeal BoardDecided Aug 9, 2006 · Administrative Judge Michael Y. Ra'anan · Appeal
Appeal at a glance
The appeal involved a denial of a security clearance based on concerns under Guidelines G and J. The applicant argued that the Administrative Judge's decision was arbitrary and capricious, citing his past rehabilitation efforts. The Board affirmed the decision, finding the Judge's conclusions sustainable and not contrary to law.
Descriptive structured reading of this decided, public Appeal Board decision: what the case says, not a prediction or advice.
Full decision
Open original PDFThe complete official text, footnotes and signatures included, is in the original PDF.
Decision text, by section
Appearances
this case, the Judge adverse decision is not arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. Adverse decision affirmed.</P>
--> <!-- /DIGEST --> <!-- CASE --> <!-- 04-07831.a1</P>
--> <!-- /CASE --> <!-- DATE --> <!-- 08/09/2006</P>
--> <!-- /DATE -->
<P>DATE: August 9, 2006</P>
<P><HR>
</P>
In Re:
<P>-------------</P>
<P>SSN:-----------</P>
<P>Applicant for Security Clearance</P>
<P><HR>
</P>
ISCR Case
Order
: underline">Signed; Michael Y. Ra'anan </SPAN></P>
<P>Michael Y. R