Skip to content
CASE
← Department of Energy hearings

Department of Energy · 10 CFR Part 710

Browse Department of Energy decisions

The published Energy Department hearing decisions. Filter by result, concern, or year. Reading a decision is free.

Two things to keep in mind about these numbers

These are hearing decisions only. The Energy Department resolves many cases without a hearing. What is here is the set that reached a hearing and produced a published decision, so it does not describe how the Energy Department decides cases overall.

A favorable decision is not the final word. In the Energy Department process a decision in the individual's favor can still be appealed by the agency, so a favorable result here is what the judge decided, not necessarily the settled outcome.

Department of Energy only

This list holds no DOHA cases, and no figure on this site adds the two records together. The words differ as well: a Department of Energy applicant receives a Notification Letter with a Summary of Security Concerns attached (not a Statement of Reasons), the government is represented by DOE Counsel (not Department Counsel), the rulebook is 10 CFR Part 710, and a review of the result is heard by the DOE Headquarters Appeal Panel. Results are favorable or not favorable to the individual, never granted or denied.

  • PSH-26-0081

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick

  • PSH-26-0020

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    James P. Thompson III

  • PSH-26-0030

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam

  • PSH-26-0033

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick

  • PSH-26-0067

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam

  • PSH-26-0015

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    James P. Thompson III

  • PSH-26-0073

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick

  • PSH-26-0010

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Noorassa A. Rahimzadeh

  • PSH-25-0140

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Diane L. Miles

  • PSH-25-0201

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    James P. Thompson III

  • PSH-25-0143

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Noorassa A. Rahimzadeh

  • PSH-26-0041

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    James P. Thompson III

  • PSH-25-0180

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    James P. Thompson III

  • PSH-25-0146

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock

  • PSH-25-0157

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Diane L. Miles

  • PSH-25-0190

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Kristin L. Martin

  • PSH-25-0173

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Diane L. Miles

  • PSH-25-0145

    Year
    2026
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam

  • PSH-25-0206

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Foreign influence (B) · Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick

  • PSH-25-0171

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick

  • PSH-25-0205

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock

  • PSH-25-0128

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Diane L. Miles

  • PSH-25-0207

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F) · Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    Noorassa A. Rahimzadeh

  • PSH-25-0136

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock

  • PSH-25-0133

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam

  • PSH-25-0121

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Kristin L. Martin

  • PSH-25-0122

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam

  • PSH-25-0112

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam

  • PSH-25-0164

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock

  • PSH-25-0101

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    James P. Thompson III

  • PSH-25-0118

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock

  • PSH-25-0100

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock

  • PSH-25-0111

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick

  • PSH-25-0084

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Kristin L. Martin

  • PSH-25-0089

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick

  • PSH-25-0058

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Matthew Rotman

  • PSH-25-0088

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Kristin L. Martin

  • PSH-25-0024

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    James P. Thompson III

  • PSH-25-0032

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Noorassa A. Rahimzadeh

  • PSH-25-0048

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Noorassa A. Rahimzadeh

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Published Department of Energy hearing decisions. Descriptive, never a prediction about any pending case.