Department of Energy · 10 CFR Part 710
Browse Department of Energy decisions
Two things to keep in mind about these numbers
These are hearing decisions only. The Energy Department resolves many cases without a hearing. What is here is the set that reached a hearing and produced a published decision, so it does not describe how the Energy Department decides cases overall.
A favorable decision is not the final word. In the Energy Department process a decision in the individual's favor can still be appealed by the agency, so a favorable result here is what the judge decided, not necessarily the settled outcome.
Department of Energy only
This list holds no DOHA cases, and no figure on this site adds the two records together. The words differ as well: a Department of Energy applicant receives a Notification Letter with a Summary of Security Concerns attached (not a Statement of Reasons), the government is represented by DOE Counsel (not Department Counsel), the rulebook is 10 CFR Part 710, and a review of the result is heard by the DOE Headquarters Appeal Panel. Results are favorable or not favorable to the individual, never granted or denied.
Concern
40 decisions matching the filters. Clear the filters.
| Case | Year | Result | Concerns | Administrative Judge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSH-16-0066 | 2016 | Favorable | Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F) | Wade M. Boswell |
| PSH-16-0072 | 2016 | Favorable | Drug involvement (H) · Criminal conduct (J) · Guideline L | Not stated |
| PSH-16-0071 | 2016 | Favorable | Financial considerations (F) | William M. Schwartz |
| PSH-16-0070 | 2016 | Favorable | Not stated | Wade M. Boswell |
| PSH-16-0068 | 2016 | Favorable | Psychological conditions (I) · Alcohol (G) | Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman |
| PSH-16-0058 | 2016 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) | Wade M. Boswell |
| PSH-16-0060 | 2016 | Favorable | Financial considerations (F) | Steven L. Fine |
| PSH-16-0063 | 2016 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) | Robert B. Palmer |
| PSH-16-0062 | 2016 | Favorable | Drug involvement (H) · Personal conduct (E) · Criminal conduct (J) | Richard A. Cronin, Jr. |
| PSH-16-0064 | 2016 | Favorable | Personal conduct (E) · Psychological conditions (I) | Not stated |
| PSH-16-0041 | 2016 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) | Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman |
| PSH-16-0055 | 2016 | Favorable | Personal conduct (E) · Foreign influence (B) | Steven L. Fine |
| PSH-16-0052 | 2016 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J) | William M. Schwartz |
| PSH-16-0057 | 2016 | Favorable | Drug involvement (H) · Criminal conduct (J) | Not stated |
| PSH-16-0047 | 2016 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) | Not stated |
| PSH-16-0048 | 2016 | Favorable | Drug involvement (H) · Personal conduct (E) | William M. Schwartz |
| PSH-16-0039 | 2016 | Favorable | Personal conduct (E) · Criminal conduct (J) | William M. Schwartz |
| PSH-16-0033 | 2016 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) · Criminal conduct (J) | Robert B. Palmer |
| PSH-16-0017 | 2016 | Favorable | Financial considerations (F) | Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman |
| PSH-16-0016 | 2016 | Favorable | Personal conduct (E) · Alcohol (G) · Drug involvement (H) · Psychological conditions (I) | Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman |
| PSH-16-0029 | 2016 | Favorable | Personal conduct (E) | Richard A. Cronin, Jr. |
| PSH-16-0031 | 2016 | Favorable | Financial considerations (F) | Robert B. Palmer |
| PSH-16-0030 | 2016 | Favorable | Financial considerations (F) | Not stated |
| PSH-16-0012 | 2016 | Favorable | Psychological conditions (I) | Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman |
| PSH-16-0015 | 2016 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) | Richard A. Cronin, Jr. |
| PSH-16-0022 | 2016 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J) | William M. Schwartz |
| PSH-16-0010 | 2016 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) | Steven L. Fine |
| PSH-16-0002 | 2016 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) · Guideline L · Personal conduct (E) · Guideline K | Wade M. Boswell |
| PSH-15-0081 | 2016 | Favorable | Not stated | Wade M. Boswell |
| PSH-16-0001 | 2016 | Favorable | Criminal conduct (J) | William M. Schwartz |
| PSH-16-0086 | 2016 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) | Steven L. Fine |
| PSH-15-0097 | 2016 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) | Wade M. Boswell |
| PSH-15-0095 | 2016 | Favorable | Personal conduct (E) · Guideline K | Richard A. Cronin, Jr. |
| PSH-15-0100 | 2016 | Favorable | Financial considerations (F) | William M. Schwartz |
| PSH-15-0083 | 2016 | Favorable | Psychological conditions (I) | Steven L. Fine |
| PSH-15-0090 | 2016 | Favorable | Psychological conditions (I) | Wade M. Boswell |
| PSH-15-0085 | 2016 | Favorable | Not stated | Robert B. Palmer |
| PSH-15-0079 | 2016 | Favorable | Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F) | Shiwali G. Patel |
| PSH-15-0084 | 2016 | Favorable | Guideline L · Guideline M | Not stated |
| PSH-15-0088 | 2016 | Favorable | Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) | Shiwali G. Patel |
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Wade M. Boswell
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Drug involvement (H) · Criminal conduct (J) · Guideline L
- Administrative Judge
- Not stated
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- William M. Schwartz
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Wade M. Boswell
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Psychological conditions (I) · Alcohol (G)
- Administrative Judge
- Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
- Administrative Judge
- Wade M. Boswell
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Steven L. Fine
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
- Administrative Judge
- Robert B. Palmer
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Drug involvement (H) · Personal conduct (E) · Criminal conduct (J)
- Administrative Judge
- Richard A. Cronin, Jr.
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Personal conduct (E) · Psychological conditions (I)
- Administrative Judge
- Not stated
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G)
- Administrative Judge
- Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Personal conduct (E) · Foreign influence (B)
- Administrative Judge
- Steven L. Fine
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
- Administrative Judge
- William M. Schwartz
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Drug involvement (H) · Criminal conduct (J)
- Administrative Judge
- Not stated
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G)
- Administrative Judge
- Not stated
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Drug involvement (H) · Personal conduct (E)
- Administrative Judge
- William M. Schwartz
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Personal conduct (E) · Criminal conduct (J)
- Administrative Judge
- William M. Schwartz
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) · Criminal conduct (J)
- Administrative Judge
- Robert B. Palmer
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Personal conduct (E) · Alcohol (G) · Drug involvement (H) · Psychological conditions (I)
- Administrative Judge
- Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Personal conduct (E)
- Administrative Judge
- Richard A. Cronin, Jr.
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Robert B. Palmer
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Not stated
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Psychological conditions (I)
- Administrative Judge
- Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
- Administrative Judge
- Richard A. Cronin, Jr.
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
- Administrative Judge
- William M. Schwartz
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G)
- Administrative Judge
- Steven L. Fine
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G) · Guideline L · Personal conduct (E) · Guideline K
- Administrative Judge
- Wade M. Boswell
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Wade M. Boswell
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Criminal conduct (J)
- Administrative Judge
- William M. Schwartz
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G)
- Administrative Judge
- Steven L. Fine
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G)
- Administrative Judge
- Wade M. Boswell
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Personal conduct (E) · Guideline K
- Administrative Judge
- Richard A. Cronin, Jr.
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- William M. Schwartz
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Psychological conditions (I)
- Administrative Judge
- Steven L. Fine
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Psychological conditions (I)
- Administrative Judge
- Wade M. Boswell
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Not stated
- Administrative Judge
- Robert B. Palmer
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F)
- Administrative Judge
- Shiwali G. Patel
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Guideline L · Guideline M
- Administrative Judge
- Not stated
- Year
- 2016
- Result
- Favorable
- Concerns
- Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
- Administrative Judge
- Shiwali G. Patel
Where to go from here
Get help with my case
Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.
Ask a question →I do this for clients
Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.
For attorneys and firms →Published Department of Energy hearing decisions. Descriptive, never a prediction about any pending case.