Skip to content
CASE
← Department of Energy hearings

Department of Energy · 10 CFR Part 710

Browse Department of Energy decisions

The published Energy Department hearing decisions. Filter by result, concern, or year. Reading a decision is free.

Two things to keep in mind about these numbers

These are hearing decisions only. The Energy Department resolves many cases without a hearing. What is here is the set that reached a hearing and produced a published decision, so it does not describe how the Energy Department decides cases overall.

A favorable decision is not the final word. In the Energy Department process a decision in the individual's favor can still be appealed by the agency, so a favorable result here is what the judge decided, not necessarily the settled outcome.

Department of Energy only

This list holds no DOHA cases, and no figure on this site adds the two records together. The words differ as well: a Department of Energy applicant receives a Notification Letter with a Summary of Security Concerns attached (not a Statement of Reasons), the government is represented by DOE Counsel (not Department Counsel), the rulebook is 10 CFR Part 710, and a review of the result is heard by the DOE Headquarters Appeal Panel. Results are favorable or not favorable to the individual, never granted or denied.

  • PSH-18-0016

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F) · Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman

  • PSH-18-0024

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Steven L. Fine

  • PSH-18-0018

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F) · Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Neil Schuldenfrei

  • PSH-18-0010

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman

  • PSH-18-0014

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Steven L. Fine

  • PSH-18-0011

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Steven L. Fine

  • PSH-18-0006

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    William M. Schwartz

  • PSH-18-0007

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Steven L. Fine

  • PSH-18-0003

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Katie Quintana

  • PSH-18-0013

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Drug involvement (H) · Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    Richard A. Cronin, Jr.

  • PSH-18-0008

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    William M. Schwartz

  • PSH-17-0090

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Richard A. Cronin, Jr.

  • PSH-18-0015

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    Not stated

  • PSH-18-0009

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman

  • PSH-18-0012

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Not stated

  • PSH-17-0091

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Not stated

  • PSH-17-0089

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Richard A. Cronin, Jr.

  • PSH-18-0001

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Steven L. Fine

  • PSH-18-0004

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Drug involvement (H)
    Administrative Judge
    Not stated

  • PSH-18-0002

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not stated
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman

  • PSH-17-0092

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Not stated

  • PSH-18-0005

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Drug involvement (H) · Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    Gregory S. Krauss

  • PSH-17-0076

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman

  • PSH-17-0073

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Foreign influence (B) · Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    Gregory S. Krauss

  • PSH-17-0068

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Steven L. Fine

  • PSH-17-0088

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman

  • PSH-17-0075

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Not stated

  • PSH-17-0086

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Richard A. Cronin, Jr.

  • PSH-17-0080

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman

  • PSH-17-0082

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Wade M. Boswell

  • PSH-17-0079

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Drug involvement (H) · Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    Richard A. Cronin, Jr.

  • PSH-17-0081

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Drug involvement (H) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Steven L. Fine

  • PSH-17-0062

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman

  • PSH-17-0077

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Not stated

  • PSH-17-0070

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Not stated

  • PSH-17-0063

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Steven L. Fine

  • PSH-17-0057

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Wade M. Boswell

  • PSH-17-0055

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Psychological conditions (I) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Richard A. Cronin, Jr.

  • PSH-17-0061

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Guideline D · Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    Kimberly Jenkins-Chapman

  • PSH-17-0069

    Year
    2018
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    William M. Schwartz

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Published Department of Energy hearing decisions. Descriptive, never a prediction about any pending case.