Skip to content
CASE
← Department of Energy hearings

Department of Energy · 10 CFR Part 710

Browse Department of Energy decisions

The published Energy Department hearing decisions. Filter by result, concern, or year. Reading a decision is free.

Two things to keep in mind about these numbers

These are hearing decisions only. The Energy Department resolves many cases without a hearing. What is here is the set that reached a hearing and produced a published decision, so it does not describe how the Energy Department decides cases overall.

A favorable decision is not the final word. In the Energy Department process a decision in the individual's favor can still be appealed by the agency, so a favorable result here is what the judge decided, not necessarily the settled outcome.

Department of Energy only

This list holds no DOHA cases, and no figure on this site adds the two records together. The words differ as well: a Department of Energy applicant receives a Notification Letter with a Summary of Security Concerns attached (not a Statement of Reasons), the government is represented by DOE Counsel (not Department Counsel), the rulebook is 10 CFR Part 710, and a review of the result is heard by the DOE Headquarters Appeal Panel. Results are favorable or not favorable to the individual, never granted or denied.

  • PSH-25-0167

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not stated
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Noorassa A. Rahimzadeh

  • PSH-25-0206

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Foreign influence (B) · Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick

  • PSH-25-0169

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Guideline D · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick

  • PSH-25-0127

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Drug involvement (H)
    Administrative Judge
    Kristin L. Martin

  • PSH-26-0001

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick

  • PSH-25-0156

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Noorassa A. Rahimzadeh

  • PSH-25-0149

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Kristin L. Martin

  • PSH-25-0171

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick

  • PSH-25-0205

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock

  • PSH-25-0128

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Diane L. Miles

  • PSH-25-0138

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Drug involvement (H)
    Administrative Judge
    Matthew Rotman

  • PSH-25-0207

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F) · Personal conduct (E)
    Administrative Judge
    Noorassa A. Rahimzadeh

  • PSH-25-0210

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Guideline K
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick

  • PSH-25-0136

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock

  • PSH-25-0125

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Noorassa A. Rahimzadeh

  • PSH-25-0107

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Kristin L. Martin

  • PSH-25-0133

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam

  • PSH-25-0144

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick

  • PSH-25-0121

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Kristin L. Martin

  • PSH-25-0104

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Diane L. Miles

  • PSH-25-0113

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    James P. Thompson III

  • PSH-25-0122

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam

  • PSH-25-0112

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam

  • PSH-25-0124

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Drug involvement (H)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock

  • PSH-25-0164

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock

  • PSH-25-0159

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Drug involvement (H)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam

  • PSH-25-0120

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam

  • PSH-25-0172

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick

  • PSH-25-0141

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Guideline D · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Kristin L. Martin

  • PSH-25-0116

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Noorassa A. Rahimzadeh

  • PSH-25-0096

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam

  • PSH-25-0102

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Noorassa A. Rahimzadeh

  • PSH-25-0101

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    James P. Thompson III

  • PSH-25-0118

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock

  • PSH-25-0109

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Drug involvement (H)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam

  • PSH-25-0105

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Drug involvement (H)
    Administrative Judge
    Diane L. Miles

  • PSH-25-0108

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam

  • PSH-25-0100

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock

  • PSH-25-0092

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock

  • PSH-25-0111

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Published Department of Energy hearing decisions. Descriptive, never a prediction about any pending case.