Skip to content
← Department of Energy hearings

Department of Energy · 10 CFR Part 710

Browse Department of Energy decisions

The published Energy Department hearing decisions. Filter by result, concern, or year. Reading a decision is free.

Two things to keep in mind about these numbers

These are hearing decisions only. The Energy Department resolves many cases without a hearing. What is here is the set that reached a hearing and produced a published decision, so it does not describe how the Energy Department decides cases overall.

A favorable decision is not the final word. In the Energy Department process a decision in the individual's favor can still be appealed by the agency, so a favorable result here is what the judge decided, not necessarily the settled outcome.

Department of Energy only

This list holds no DOHA cases, and no figure on this site adds the two records together. The words differ as well: a Department of Energy applicant receives a Notification Letter with a Summary of Security Concerns attached (not a Statement of Reasons), the government is represented by DOE Counsel (not Department Counsel), the rulebook is 10 CFR Part 710, and a review of the result is heard by the DOE Headquarters Appeal Panel. Results are favorable or not favorable to the individual, never granted or denied.

  • PSH-25-0095

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    James P. Thompson III
  • PSH-25-0091

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Diane L. Miles
  • PSH-25-0106

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock
  • PSH-25-0067

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Kristin L. Martin
  • PSH-25-0114

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Drug involvement (H)
    Administrative Judge
    Diane L. Miles
  • PSH-25-0094

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Noorassa A. Rahimzadeh
  • PSH-25-0126

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam
  • PSH-25-0093

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick
  • PSH-25-0082

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Diane L. Miles
  • PSH-25-0080

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Matthew Rotman
  • PSH-25-0073

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick
  • PSH-25-0068

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Drug involvement (H)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam
  • PSH-25-0135

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick
  • PSH-25-0065

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick
  • PSH-25-0063

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    James P. Thompson III
  • PSH-25-0074

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Diane L. Miles
  • PSH-25-0084

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Kristin L. Martin
  • PSH-25-0052

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Drug involvement (H)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock
  • PSH-25-0078

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick
  • PSH-25-0071

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock
  • PSH-25-0069

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not stated
    Concerns
    Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Matthew Rotman
  • PSH-25-0085

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Noorassa A. Rahimzadeh
  • PSH-25-0098

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam
  • PSH-25-0066

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Diane L. Miles
  • PSH-25-0089

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Financial considerations (F) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick
  • PSH-25-0062

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    James P. Thompson III
  • PSH-25-0070

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick
  • PSH-25-0059

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    James P. Thompson III
  • PSH-25-0061

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Criminal conduct (J) · Guideline K
    Administrative Judge
    Phillip Harmonick
  • PSH-25-0058

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F)
    Administrative Judge
    Matthew Rotman
  • PSH-25-0027

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock
  • PSH-25-0051

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Matthew Rotman
  • PSH-25-0099

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Andrew Dam
  • PSH-25-0040

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Kristin L. Martin
  • PSH-25-0072

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Personal conduct (E) · Drug involvement (H)
    Administrative Judge
    Noorassa A. Rahimzadeh
  • PSH-25-0057

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G)
    Administrative Judge
    Erin C. Weinstock
  • PSH-25-0023

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Noorassa A. Rahimzadeh
  • PSH-25-0015

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Psychological conditions (I) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    James P. Thompson III
  • PSH-25-0088

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Not favorable
    Concerns
    Financial considerations (F) · Psychological conditions (I)
    Administrative Judge
    Kristin L. Martin
  • PSH-25-0037

    Year
    2025
    Result
    Favorable
    Concerns
    Alcohol (G) · Criminal conduct (J)
    Administrative Judge
    Noorassa A. Rahimzadeh

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Published Department of Energy hearing decisions. Descriptive, never a prediction about any pending case.