Found 316 matching decisions — showing 151–200.
Decided public cases — descriptive, never a prediction.
The judge found that the applicant's marriage to a Mexican citizen who is residing in the United States illegally, along with her regular travel to Mexico to visit her in-laws, raised significant foreign influence concerns. The judge ruled against the applicant on all allegations under Guideline B, ...
The judge found that the applicant did not deliberately fail to disclose debts in his security clearance application. The applicant's explanation for the omission was credible, and he had disclosed his delinquent debt status to his employer. The judge concluded that the applicant mitigated the perso...
The judge found that the applicant has numerous relatives who are citizens and residents of Iraq, which raised significant foreign influence concerns. The applicant's decision to disobey a company directive while working in Iraq further complicated his case, leading to a denial of his security clear...
The judge found that the applicant's numerous relatives who are citizens and residents of Saudi Arabia and Romania create a potential foreign influence security concern. The applicant's ties to these foreign nationals, including financial support received from his Saudi Arabian siblings, were deemed...
The applicant was found to have engaged in serious sexual misconduct, including the sexual abuse of his three stepdaughters and other minors. The judge ruled against the applicant on all allegations under Guideline D, citing the severity of the offenses and the applicant's failure to mitigate the as...
The judge found that the applicant's past employment with a Saudi Arabian Prince did not pose a security risk, as he had no ongoing ties or financial interests in Saudi Arabia. The applicant's actions were deemed to have been in support of U.S. foreign relations, leading to a decision in favor of gr...
The judge found that the applicant deliberately provided false and misleading information in his security clearance application and during an interview with a Special Agent. The applicant's conduct raised significant concerns about his trustworthiness and reliability, leading to a denial of his secu...
The judge found that the applicant's personal conduct raised significant security concerns, particularly due to a history of criminal offenses and deliberate omissions in a security clearance application. The applicant's failure to mitigate these concerns led to a denial of the security clearance.
The judge found that the applicant repeatedly and deliberately provided false information regarding his abuse of controlled substances in security clearance documents and interviews. The applicant's conduct raised significant concerns about his trustworthiness and reliability, leading to the denial ...
The judge found that the applicant did not deliberately provide false information or fail to disclose accurate information when submitting the SF 86. No disqualifying condition applied under Guideline E, and the applicant successfully mitigated the personal conduct concerns. Clearance is granted.
The applicant was charged with three criminal offenses between 1979 and 2000, with the last two charges being dismissed. The judge found that the applicant successfully mitigated the security concern caused by his criminal conduct, resulting in a granted clearance.
The judge found that the applicant mitigated the personal conduct concerns related to her gambling habit and the financial issues it created. The allegations under Guideline E were decided for the applicant, leading to the granting of her security clearance.
The applicant was charged with five criminal offenses between 1985 and 2001. The judge found that the applicant failed to mitigate the security concerns arising from his criminal conduct, leading to a denial of clearance.
The judge found that the applicant mitigated the security concerns related to his past abuse of marijuana and psychedelic mushrooms during college and for about a year thereafter. The applicant's commitment to treatment and abstinence was noted, leading to the granting of his security clearance.
The judge found that the applicant had approximately $15,000 in debt owed to eight creditors, which had either been charged off or submitted for collection. Despite having the means to address these debts, the applicant failed to take adequate action to resolve them, leading to a denial of the secur...
The judge found that the applicant, a naturalized U.S. citizen, mitigated concerns regarding foreign influence due to his family ties in Vietnam. The applicant's minimal contact with his brothers, strong ties to the U.S., and adherence to security protocols during travel to Vietnam contributed to th...
The applicant failed to disclose a 1997 Article 15 punishment and a 1999 DUI charge in his security clearance application. However, the judge found that the applicant did not deliberately provide false or misleading information, and thus, the personal conduct concerns were mitigated. The decision gr...
The applicant, a naturalized U.S. citizen since 1988, has no relatives residing in a foreign country and has mitigated the foreign influence security concerns. The judge found that the applicant's brother, a permanent resident alien, does not pose a security risk due to their limited contact. Cleara...
The judge found that the applicant had a history of alcohol-related offenses, including a DUI in 2001 and several public intoxication incidents. However, the applicant disclosed the DUI and one other offense in his security clearance application but failed to list other minor offenses. The judge det...
The judge found against the applicant on the Guideline E personal conduct allegation, determining that the applicant's mishandling of classified information raised significant security concerns. The applicant's explanations for his actions were deemed not credible, leading to the denial of his secur...
The judge found against the applicant on all allegations under Guideline E, citing numerous omissions and failures to disclose relevant information in his security clearance application. The applicant's history of criminal conduct and substance abuse further contributed to the decision to deny his s...
The applicant was convicted of smuggling goods into the United States in February 1973, for which he was sentenced to four years imprisonment and served approximately 15 months. Although the judge found some mitigating factors, the applicant was ultimately denied a security clearance due to the stat...
The judge found that the applicant engaged in excessive alcohol consumption and drug use, which included multiple arrests for driving under the influence. The applicant failed to disclose significant aspects of this conduct in her security clearance application. The judge concluded that the applican...
The judge found that the applicant, a naturalized U.S. citizen, successfully mitigated the foreign influence concerns related to his family ties in the People's Republic of China. The applicant's parents and in-laws are citizens of China, but the judge determined that the applicant's strong ties to ...
The judge found that the applicant, a dual citizen of Panama and the United States, had familial ties in Panama, including a mother and brothers who are citizens and residents there. However, these relationships did not create an unacceptable security concern. The applicant demonstrated his loyalty ...
The applicant was found to have omitted a prior DWI conviction from his security clearance application, citing it as an oversight. The judge determined that the omission was not deliberate and credited the applicant's explanation. Ultimately, the judge ruled in favor of the applicant under Guideline...
The applicant faced significant financial concerns due to numerous delinquent debts totaling over $17,300, including a foreclosure and several collection accounts. The judge found that while some debts were mitigated, the overall financial situation was insufficient to grant a security clearance, re...
The judge found that the applicant's past conduct did not justify concerns regarding his trustworthiness for a security clearance. The applicant disclosed his drug use in a security clearance application and credibly explained the omission of earlier use in statements to an investigator. The judge c...
The applicant was denied a security clearance due to multiple alcohol-related incidents, including two DUI convictions. Despite attending some Alcoholics Anonymous meetings and completing a brief outpatient program, the applicant continued to consume alcohol after his last DUI and failed to demonstr...
The judge found that the applicant willfully and maliciously destroyed company and government documents after being informed of her transfer. The applicant failed to mitigate the security concern caused by her personal conduct, leading to the denial of her security clearance.
The applicant had several delinquent accounts, including two judgments and a repossession, but entered a repayment program through a credit counseling service. The judge found that the applicant had mitigated the financial concerns and granted the security clearance.
The judge found multiple instances of personal conduct concerns under Guideline E, including deliberate omissions and false statements in security clearance applications. The applicant's conduct was deemed to undermine trust and confidence necessary for holding a security clearance, leading to a den...
The applicant, a naturalized U.S. citizen, faced security clearance denial due to foreign influence concerns stemming from his wife's citizenship and his in-laws' residency in China. The judge found that the applicant failed to mitigate these concerns, leading to a decision against him.
The judge found that the applicant successfully mitigated foreign influence concerns stemming from his marriage to a Russian citizen. Despite the marriage, the applicant and his wife have been separated since 2003, have minimal contact, and are in the process of divorce. The judge ruled in favor of ...
The judge found that the applicant, a naturalized U.S. citizen, has failed to mitigate security concerns related to his ties to Ukraine, specifically due to his father-in-law and brother-in-law being citizens and residents of Ukraine. Although the applicant's wife and daughter are U.S. citizens, the...
The applicant has significant financial issues, including delinquent debts and unpaid taxes, which he has not adequately addressed. The judge ruled against the applicant on all financial allegations, concluding that he failed to mitigate the security concerns related to his financial situation.
The applicant was convicted of conversion of government property in 1998, sentenced to five years supervised probation, and ordered to pay restitution to the United States. The judge ruled against the applicant on all allegations under Guideline J, resulting in a denial of the security clearance.
The judge found that the applicant mitigated the security concerns related to foreign influence due to her close ties with her immediate family and friends in South Korea. The applicant's relationships were deemed not to pose a security risk, leading to the granting of her security clearance.
The applicant used marijuana on multiple occasions, including while holding a security clearance, and tested positive for marijuana in 1999 and 2001. He was required to attend drug treatment programs but failed to mitigate the security concerns associated with his drug use. Consequently, his applica...
The judge found significant financial concerns under Guideline F, noting the applicant's history of bankruptcy and numerous delinquent accounts totaling over $28,000. Despite being employed, the applicant failed to take steps to resolve his debts, leading to a decision against him.
The judge found that the applicant deliberately failed to disclose multiple alcohol-related offenses and numerous delinquent accounts in security clearance applications. These omissions and false statements raised significant security concerns, leading to the denial of the applicant's clearance.
The applicant, a dual citizen of Brazil and the United States, faced security concerns under Guideline C due to his foreign preference. The judge found against the applicant on most allegations, primarily due to his unwillingness to surrender his Brazilian passport, which he needed to visit his aili...
The applicant was convicted of three specifications of distribution of methamphetamine and one specification of attempt to distribute methamphetamine while on active duty in the U.S. Army in 1983. He received a dishonorable discharge and was sentenced to one year of confinement. The judge found that...
The applicant had a history of alcohol abuse that led to his termination from employment in April 2003. However, he has been abstinent from alcohol since at least September 2003 and has made significant lifestyle changes. The judge found that the applicant mitigated the security concerns related to ...
The judge found that the applicant's close family ties in Colombia, including a mother, brother, and uncle who reside there, along with the applicant's previous use of a Colombian passport, created an unacceptable security risk. Although the applicant renounced his Colombian citizenship and surrende...
The applicant, a dual citizen of Jordan and the United States, faced multiple allegations under Guideline B concerning foreign influence due to his immediate family members residing in foreign countries and their dual citizenship. The judge found that while one subparagraph was ruled in favor of the...
The judge found that the applicant provided false answers in his Security Clearance Application (SF 86) and during his interview, which raised significant security concerns. The applicant's explanations for these omissions were deemed not credible, leading to a decision against him under Guideline E...
The applicant faced financial concerns primarily due to significant debts incurred during and after a divorce. The judge found that the applicant had mitigated these concerns by paying off most debts and demonstrating financial stability, ultimately granting the security clearance.
The judge found that the applicant's personal conduct concerns were mitigated. Although the applicant had provided false information during an interview regarding a past incident, he later disclosed the truth in a security clearance application. The judge concluded that the applicant's actions did n...
The judge found that the applicant provided numerous false answers in his security clearance application (SF 86), which included failing to disclose alcohol-related offenses and delinquent accounts. The judge ruled against the applicant under Guideline E, concluding that the applicant's personal con...