A decided public DOHA case, shown for research, not advice or a prediction.
ISCR Case No. 00-0713.a1
Appeal BoardDecided Feb 15, 2002 · Administrative Judge Michael Y. Ra'anan · Appeal
Appeal at a glance
The appeal involved a challenge by Department Counsel to an Administrative Judge's favorable decision granting a security clearance to the applicant. The Board found that the Judge's findings were not supported by substantial evidence and that her application of mitigating conditions was arbitrary and capricious, leading to a reversal of the favorable decision.
Descriptive structured reading of this decided, public Appeal Board decision: what the case says, not a prediction or advice.
Full decision
Open original PDFThe complete official text, footnotes and signatures included, is in the original PDF.
Decision text, by section
Appeal Board Decision
ble decision reversed.</P>
<P>CASENO: 00-07
Appearances
bruary 15, 2002</P>
<P><HR>
</P>
In Re:
Procedural History
ryn A. Trowbridge, Esq., D
Procedural Matters
d.</P>
<BR WP="BR1"
Appeal Issues
</EM>. Rather, the B
Discussion
1) at pp. 2-3 (discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with specificity).</P>
<BR WP="BR1"><BR W
Discussion
naire; and (b) the Judge failed to take into account Applicant's conflicting statements about why the information about h
Discussion
other than demeanor and
inflection go into the decision whether or not to believe a witness. Documents or objective e
Discussion
did
not disclose her termination on the security questionnaire because she did not believe it was covered by question 20 on the form
Discussion
th correction of falsification).</P>
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P>As discussed earli
Conclusion
> was applicable because