Guideline E: Personal Conduct
Decided hearing cases
8,570
Grant rate
23%
1,982 granted · 6,588 denied
Specific issues and their outcomes
Falsified the security form
10% granted · 305 granted · 2,758 denied
Personal conduct (unspecified)
26% granted · 779 granted · 2,169 denied
Omission / failure to disclose
26% granted · 692 granted · 1,946 denied
Lack of candor in an interview
11% granted · 170 granted · 1,406 denied
Questionable judgment
25% granted · 348 granted · 1,070 denied
Workplace rules violation
20% granted · 151 granted · 600 denied
Mitigations judges credited most
- Promptly corrected the falsification84
- Acknowledgment & remorse72
- Credible explanation of omission41
- Passage of time20
- Rehabilitation evidence19
Counted only where the judge expressly credited the mitigation, not merely where it was claimed.
What the reference material says about personal-conduct cases
- The recurring theme across the practitioner literature: the concealment routinely weighs more heavily than the underlying conduct. Prompt, self-initiated correction of the record before confrontation is a recognized mitigating condition. (Practitioner sources; SEAD-4 mitigating conditions)
From our verified reference library: paraphrased from the named sources and reviewed before publication. Descriptive background, not legal advice about any case.
How the process worksA contested case follows a published sequence. Open this for the short version, or put a question to Ask Mode on the home page. Accounts are free and include up to 25 questions per day.
A contested case follows a published path: a Statement of Reasons, the government's written list of its concerns (an SOR), a written answer, a hearing or a decision on the written record, the judge's decision, and in some cases an appeal.
Read the stages of a DOHA case · Ask a question about the process
Where to go from here
Get help with my case
Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.
Ask a question →I do this for clients
Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.
For attorneys and firms →Descriptive statistics from decided public DOHA cases. Not legal advice or a prediction. † marks samples under 20 cases.