A decided public DOHA case, shown for research, not advice or a prediction.
ISCR Case No. 03-16251
Appeal BoardDecided May 10, 2006 · Administrative Judge Jean E. Smallin · Appeal
Appeal at a glance
The appeal involved a denial of a security clearance based on concerns related to alcohol consumption and security violations. The Applicant argued that the Administrative Judge's findings were arbitrary and capricious. The Board affirmed the denial, finding the Judge's conclusions were supported by substantial evidence and not contrary to law.
Descriptive structured reading of this decided, public Appeal Board decision: what the case says, not a prediction or advice.
Full decision
Open original PDFThe complete official text, footnotes and signatures included, is in the original PDF.
Decision text, by section
Appearances
1</P> --> <!-- /CASE --> <!-- DATE --> <!-- 05/10/2006</P> --> <!-- /DATE --> <P>DATE: May 10, 2006</P> <P><HR> </P> In Re: <P>----------------</P> <P>SSN: -----------</P> <P>Applicant for Security Clearance</P> <P><HR> </P> ISCR Case No. 03-16251 <P STYLE="text-align: CENTER"><STRONG>APPEAL BOARD
Order
with his two children at his son's place, and another beer just before arriving at work around 11:30 a.m. (Tr. 202) <P><A NAME="N_3_">3. </A>Applicant refers to the Judge's findings and/or conclusions; but with the exception of one statement in the Judge's synopsis, his objections relat