A decided public DOHA case, shown for research, not advice or a prediction.
ISCR Case No. 04-09488
Appeal BoardDecided Nov 29, 2006 · Administrative Judge Barry M. Sax · Appeal
Appeal at a glance
The appeal involved a denial of a security clearance based on concerns under Guidelines E and J. The applicant argued that the Administrative Judge's decision was arbitrary and capricious, claiming he did not intentionally provide false information. The Board affirmed the decision, finding the Judge's conclusions were supported by substantial evidence and not contrary to law.
Descriptive structured reading of this decided, public Appeal Board decision: what the case says, not a prediction or advice.
Full decision
Open original PDFThe complete official text, footnotes and signatures included, is in the original PDF.
Decision text, by section
Appearances
on did not preclude the Judge from weighing the record evidence and making findings that contradicted Applicant's denials. An applicant's disagreement with the Judge's weighing of the evidence, or an ability to argue for a different interpretation of the evidence, is not sufficient to demon
Order
PAN STYLE="text-decoration: underline">Signed: James E. Moody </SPAN></SPAN></