Skip to content
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline D · Sexual Behavior

Extramarital Relationship with Coercion Risk

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does extramarital relationship with coercion risk affect a security clearance?

Extramarital Relationship with Coercion Risk is an issue decided under Guideline D, Sexual Behavior. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 45 hearing-level cases, and 16% of the 45 decided ended with access granted (7 granted, 38 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 45 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

45

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

16%

7 granted · 38 denied or revoked

Recent decided examples

  • The applicant in this case was a 58-year-old individual who submitted a security clearance application on October 17, 2023. The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency issued a Statement of Re…

  • The judge found that the applicant mitigated security concerns related to his relationship with an adult film actress. The government did not provide credible evidence that the applicant engaged in il…

  • The applicant in this case was a 58-year-old naturalized U.S. citizen who sought a security clearance to work for a U.S. defense contractor. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons cit…

  • The applicant in this case was a 61-year-old employee of a defense contractor who had held a security clearance since approximately 2004. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) …

See all 45 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline D

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.