Skip to main content

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline D · Sexual Behavior

Online / Electronic Sexual Misconduct

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, never a prediction.

Decided cases
35
verified hearing-level decisions
Granted
20%
7 granted · 28 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions in play

The formal mitigating conditions (by official paragraph) that case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted vs denied. Extracted for a subset of cases; counts are cases, not percentages of everything. Read what each condition says.

ConditionIn granted casesIn denied cases
¶ 14(b)42

Recent decided examples

  • ISCR 24-01359 granted · 2025
    the conduct occurred in a context that is unlikely to recur, it may be considered mitigated. The administrative judge found that the applicant's behavior occurred in a specific and unusual circumstanc
  • ISCR 08-05351.h1 granted · 2009
    The judge found that the applicant's past sexual behavior, which included accessing pornography on a work computer, raised security concerns under Guideline D. However, the applicant successfully miti
  • ISCR 19-01753 denied · 2020
    The applicant in this case was a 55-year-old communication system engineer who had been employed by a Department of Defense (DOD) contractor and previously served in the Air Force. The adjudicative gu
  • ISCR 19-02724 denied · 2020
    The applicant in this case was a 53-year-old manufacturing and quality assurance engineer employed by a U.S. Government contractor. He sought a security clearance, which was challenged due to allegati

See all 35 decisions on this issue →

Wondering how this issue plays against your own facts? Ask the assistant, or get a written, human-reviewed response through Answers. Descriptive research only: not legal advice or a prediction.