Skip to content
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline D · Sexual Behavior

Criminal Sexual Conduct (D-side)

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does criminal sexual conduct (d-side) affect a security clearance?

Criminal Sexual Conduct (D-side) is an issue decided under Guideline D, Sexual Behavior. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 270 hearing-level cases, and 13% of the 270 decided ended with access granted (34 granted, 236 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 270 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

270

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

13%

34 granted · 236 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions cited

The formal mitigating conditions the case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted and in cases that were denied. Each is shown with its paragraph number and a plain name. Read what each condition says.
  • ¶ 14(b) · So long ago, so infrequent, or so unusual that it is unlikely to recur

    In granted cases
    19
    In denied cases
    10
  • ¶ 14(c) · No longer a basis for coercion or pressure

    In granted cases
    12
    In denied cases
    3
  • ¶ 14(d) · Private, consensual, and discreet

    In granted cases
    8
    In denied cases
    3
  • ¶ 14(e) · Treatment completed or under way, with a favorable prognosis

    In granted cases
    5
    In denied cases
    1
  • ¶ 14(a) · The behavior was adolescent, with nothing similar since

    In granted cases
    3
    In denied cases
    3

Circumstances credited in granted cases

The specific circumstances the judge expressly credited among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted.
  • successful rehabilitation · credited in 3 granted cases
  • no longer serves as basis for coercion · credited in 1 granted case
  • no subsequent similar conduct · credited in 1 granted case
  • no evidence of emotional instability · credited in 1 granted case
  • remorse and rehabilitation · credited in 1 granted case

Recent decided examples

  • the conditions that could mitigate security concerns. The administrative judge considered several mitigating factors, including the fact that the applicant's misconduct occurred during his adolescence…

  • The applicant in this case was a 28-year-old employee of a defense contractor, who had been employed since March 2023. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) alleging security c…

  • The applicant's security clearance was denied due to unresolved security concerns under Guidelines D, J, and E. The allegations included felony sexual assault on a minor, multiple criminal conduct cha…

  • The case involves an applicant who was denied security clearance due to unresolved criminal charges related to online solicitation of a minor, alongside allegations of sexual behavior and personal con…

See all 270 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline D

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.