Skip to content
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline F · Financial

Gambling Losses or Compulsive Gambling

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does gambling losses or compulsive gambling affect a security clearance?

Gambling Losses or Compulsive Gambling is an issue decided under Guideline F, Financial. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 45 hearing-level cases, and 22% of the 45 decided ended with access granted (10 granted, 35 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 45 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

45

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

22%

10 granted · 35 denied or revoked

Recent decided examples

  • The applicant in this case was a 57-year-old linguist for a defense contractor who sought a security clearance. The allegations in the Statement of Reasons (SOR) involved foreign influence under Guide…

  • The judge found that the applicant mitigated financial concerns related to multiple debts, including a past-due mortgage, collection accounts, and a federal tax lien. The applicant demonstrated signif…

  • Applicant, a 39 year old pro se respondent, was denied a security clearance under Guideline F. The judge found that Applicant had a 2013 Chapter 7 bankruptcy, a dismissed 2024 bankruptcy, 14 unresolve…

  • The applicant in this case was a 62-year-old security officer employed by a federal contractor since 2015. He faced security concerns under Guidelines F (Financial Considerations) and E (Personal Cond…

See all 45 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline F

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.