Found 828 matching decisions — showing 801–828.
Decided public cases — descriptive, never a prediction.
The applicant's drug involvement included the use of LSD, Ecstasy, and marijuana from approximately 1993 until at least March 1997. The judge found that the applicant's recent and potential future drug use raised significant security concerns, leading to a denial of the security clearance.
The applicant's drug involvement included marijuana and methamphetamine use over several years. The judge found against the applicant on all allegations related to drug involvement, concluding that the applicant's history of drug use raised significant security concerns.
The Administrative Judge found against the applicant on all allegations related to alcohol consumption. The applicant had a history of alcohol abuse, including two DUI convictions, and while he has abstained from alcohol since his last arrest, the judge determined that it was too soon to conclude th...
The applicant has a history of alcohol abuse, including two recent DUI convictions. The judge found against the applicant on all allegations related to alcohol consumption, concluding that the applicant did not sufficiently mitigate the security concerns raised by his past behavior.
The applicant faced multiple financial difficulties, including debts from a mortgage deficiency, credit card debts incurred by an ex-spouse, and a furniture debt. The judge ruled against the applicant on all financial allegations, concluding that the applicant had not demonstrated sufficient efforts...
The judge found that the applicant's admitted drug usage, including marijuana and cocaine, raised significant security concerns. The applicant's recent marijuana use and history of drug involvement were deemed insufficiently mitigated, leading to a denial of the security clearance.
The applicant was found to have a long history of alcohol abuse, including multiple arrests for public intoxication and driving while intoxicated. Despite periods of treatment and a recent period of sobriety, the judge ruled against the applicant on all allegations related to alcohol consumption, co...
The Applicant engaged in inappropriate sexual behavior, including two extramarital affairs and hiring a prostitute, which raised security concerns. However, the Applicant demonstrated credible evidence of remorse and an intention to avoid such behavior in the future, leading to a favorable ruling.
The judge found that the applicant's past drug involvement, primarily with marijuana, did not pose a current security risk. The applicant demonstrated significant mitigation through abstinence from drug use for over two years, a change in environment, and credible evidence of no ongoing drug depende...
The judge found multiple financial concerns against the applicant, including a dismissed Chapter 13 bankruptcy and significant delinquent debts exceeding $12,000. The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence of mitigation, leading to a denial of the security clearance.
The judge found that the applicant's extensive history of methamphetamine abuse, including multiple arrests and a diagnosis of chemical addiction, raised significant security concerns. Despite the applicant's claims of attending Narcotics Anonymous and intentions to abstain from drug use, the judge ...
The judge found that the applicant's financial difficulties were primarily due to a challenging marriage and the actions of his spouse, who mismanaged funds intended for debt payments. The applicant demonstrated a commitment to resolving his debts, leading to a decision in his favor regarding financ...
The judge found that the applicant's drug involvement, specifically marijuana use, was significant enough to deny the security clearance. The applicant used marijuana approximately two times per week for nearly ten years and expressed a future intent to continue using it, although he later claimed h...
The Administrative Judge ruled against the applicant on all allegations related to alcohol consumption, citing a history of excessive alcohol use and multiple incidents of alcohol-related arrests. The applicant was diagnosed with Alcohol Dependence and had not demonstrated sufficient evidence of reh...
The applicant's drug involvement was assessed under Guideline H, specifically regarding his admitted marijuana use over a three-year period. The judge found against the applicant on all allegations, concluding that the applicant did not sufficiently mitigate the security concerns raised by his drug ...
The applicant had a history of alcohol consumption, including two alcohol-related arrests, but ceased drinking in October 1996 and began attending Alcoholics Anonymous meetings. The judge found that the applicant's past alcohol consumption was no longer of present security significance, leading to a...
The judge found that the applicant's past drug involvement and criminal conduct did not pose a current security risk. The applicant's drug use was infrequent and occurred many years ago, and he has since distanced himself from problematic influences. The decision was made to grant the security clear...
The judge found that the applicant knowingly and willfully failed to disclose his past drug involvement on two occasions, which raised significant personal conduct concerns. The applicant's lack of candor regarding his drug use was deemed to have present security significance, leading to a denial of...
The judge found that the applicant's long history of marijuana use, including two convictions for possession, raised significant security concerns. The applicant's claims of using marijuana for medical reasons were not substantiated with documentation or credible evidence, leading to a decision agai...
The judge found that the applicant had a history of drug abuse, including the use of LSD, mescaline, marijuana, amphetamines, and cocaine. Despite the applicant's claims of being drug-free and having no intention to use illegal drugs in the future, the judge concluded that the applicant's recent add...
The judge found that the applicant's alcohol consumption raised significant security concerns, particularly due to a history of excessive drinking and two DUI convictions. Despite a court order to abstain from alcohol, the applicant continued to consume alcohol, which the judge deemed indicative of ...
The judge found that the applicant's financial difficulties stemmed from a failed real estate venture that occurred over five years ago. The applicant's efforts to address these debts through bankruptcy were deemed sufficient to mitigate the security concerns, leading to a decision in favor of grant...
The applicant's drug involvement included regular marijuana use and daily cocaine use over a significant period. The judge found that the applicant's history of drug abuse, including theft to support his habit, raised serious concerns about his reliability and trustworthiness, leading to a denial of...
The judge found several instances of personal conduct where the applicant knowingly failed to disclose relevant information on security forms. The applicant's lack of candor regarding past drug use and related criminal conduct was deemed significant, leading to a denial of the security clearance.
The judge found against the applicant on all allegations related to drug involvement, noting the applicant's long history of marijuana use and intent to continue using it in the future. The applicant's drug abuse was deemed to raise significant security concerns, leading to the denial of the securit...
The judge found against the applicant on multiple allegations of personal conduct related to drug use and falsification of information on security forms. The applicant's repeated failures to disclose past drug usage and the lack of prompt correction of these omissions were significant factors in the...
The judge ruled against the applicant on all allegations related to criminal conduct, specifically the willful failure to file federal and state income tax returns for multiple years. The applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to mitigate the concerns raised by his criminal conduct, leading t...
The judge found in favor of the applicant on all allegations related to criminal conduct, specifically regarding the untimely filing of federal and state income tax returns for the years 1987, 1988, and 1989. The applicant demonstrated that he has since filed all outstanding returns and is current w...