Skip to main content
CASE

Decisions by country · Guideline B · Foreign Influence

Ties to Germany in decided clearance cases

How decided foreign-influence cases involving ties to Germany resolved, from the public record. Ties to any country are not themselves disqualifying; every case turns on its own facts. This is decided history, not a prediction, and it says nothing about any nationality or community.

Decided cases
39
verified hearing-level decisions
Granted
69%
27 granted · 12 denied or revoked
Ties living in the U.S.
at least 3
cases where the decision states a relative or contact lives in the United States. Counted only when the decision says so expressly, so this is a minimum.

The ties these cases involved

The relationship kinds identified on Germany allegations in these cases (a case can involve several).

  • sibling in foreign country · 15 cases
  • parent in foreign country · 8 cases
  • friend in foreign country · 7 cases
  • unspecified foreign relationship · 6 cases
  • extended family in foreign country · 5 cases
  • in law in foreign country · 4 cases
  • foreign bank account or investment · 4 cases

Circumstances credited in granted cases

Circumstances the judge expressly credited among granted Germany cases where that detail was extracted (a subset of the record, so these are raw counts, not rates).

  • deep U.S. ties · credited in 6 granted cases

Recent decided examples

  • ISCR 21-00857 granted · 2022
    The applicant in this case was a 35-year-old employee of a defense contractor and a Captain in the Air Force Reserve, who had held a security clearance since 2011. The Department of Defense issued a S…
  • ISCR 23-02263 granted · 2025
    The applicant in this case was a 37-year-old native of Afghanistan who sought a security clearance after being employed as a linguist for U.S. military forces. The Defense Counterintelligence and Secu…
  • ISCR 23-00576 denied · 2024
    The applicant in this case was a 59-year-old employee of a defense contractor seeking a security clearance. The adjudicative guidelines at issue were Guideline B (Foreign Influence) and Guideline E (P…
  • ISCR 09-05224.h1 denied · 2011
    The judge found that the applicant mitigated foreign influence security concerns but ultimately denied eligibility for access to classified information due to personal conduct issues. The applicant's …

Search all Guideline B decisions mentioning Germany →

Other countries in the record

For how the process treats foreign family and contacts: the assistant searches the record, the Guideline B reference explains the official conditions, and the CASE Prep service provides a written, human-reviewed response. Descriptive research only: not legal advice or a prediction.