Skip to content
CASE
← Decisions by country

Decisions by country · Guideline B · Foreign Influence

Ties to Mexico in decided clearance cases

What the decided public record shows for cases in which ties to Mexico were alleged. Ties to any country are not themselves disqualifying, and every case turns on its own facts. This is decided history, not a prediction, and it says nothing about any nationality or community.

Decided cases

32

hearing-level decisions naming this country in the text

Granted

41%

13 granted · 19 denied or revoked

Ties living in the United States

at least 8

decisions stating expressly that the relative or contact lives in the United States, so this is a floor

The ties these cases involved

The kinds of relationship identified on Mexico allegations in these cases. A case can involve several, and the bars count cases rather than outcomes, so they carry no colour.
Parent in foreign country14 cases
In law in foreign country10 cases
Spouse dual or foreign citizen9 cases
Sibling in foreign country7 cases
Extended family in foreign country6 cases
Unspecified foreign relationship4 cases
Foreign real estate4 cases

Circumstances credited in granted cases

Circumstances the judge expressly credited among granted Mexico cases where that detail was extracted. Extraction covers a subset of the record, so these are raw counts and not rates.
  • deep U.S. ties · credited in 4 granted cases

Recent decided examples

  • ISCR Case No. 24-00227Granted2025

    Applicant, a 53-year-old employee of a defense contractor and a retired U.S. Army Warrant Officer, sought a security clearance after the Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citin…

  • ISCR Case No. 20-02788Granted2021

    Applicant, a 22-year-old self-employed business owner, sought a security clearance to work as an aircraft structural mechanic for a defense contractor. The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Age…

  • ISCR Case No. 26-00171Denied2026

    The applicant's security clearance was denied due to unresolved financial issues under Guideline F, despite mitigating factors under Guideline B related to foreign influence. The applicant admitted to…

  • ISCR Case No. 25-00848Denied2026

    Applicant, a 22 year old roofer for a defense contractor, was born in the United States, lived in Mexico for years, and holds dual U.S. and Mexican citizenship. He admitted using a Mexican passport to…

Search all Guideline B decisions mentioning Mexico

Other countries in the record

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose Guideline B allegations name this country. The country field is free text in the source, so the variants observed in the record are mapped onto one canonical name and nothing is guessed; records naming several countries in one field are excluded rather than split. A case naming two countries counts once under each. Counts of country risk and of ties living in the United States are counted only where the decision says so expressly, so both are floors. Pages exist only for countries with at least 25 decided cases.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.