Skip to content
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline B · Foreign Influence

Financial Support to Foreign Relative

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does financial support to foreign relative affect a security clearance?

Financial Support to Foreign Relative is an issue decided under Guideline B, Foreign Influence. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 413 hearing-level cases, and 46% of the 413 decided ended with access granted (192 granted, 221 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 413 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

413

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

46%

192 granted · 221 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions cited

The formal mitigating conditions the case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted and in cases that were denied. Each is shown with its paragraph number and a plain name. Read what each condition says.
  • ¶ 8(a) · A conflict between foreign and United States interests is unlikely

    In granted cases
    112
    In denied cases
    7
  • ¶ 8(b) · Deep and longstanding ties to the United States

    In granted cases
    64
    In denied cases
    5
  • ¶ 8(c) · Contact so casual and infrequent that there is little risk

    In granted cases
    18
    In denied cases
    1
  • ¶ 8(e) · Reporting requirements met promptly

    In granted cases
    10
    In denied cases
    1

Circumstances credited in granted cases

The specific circumstances the judge expressly credited among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted.
  • deep U.S. ties · credited in 49 granted cases
  • U.S. military service · credited in 1 granted case

Recent decided examples

  • The case involves an applicant seeking security clearance who faced allegations under Guideline B for foreign influence and Guideline H for drug involvement. The applicant admitted to the allegations …

  • Applicant, a 53-year-old employee of a defense contractor and a retired U.S. Army Warrant Officer, sought a security clearance after the Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citin…

  • The applicant, a naturalized U.S. citizen from Sudan, was denied security clearance due to foreign influence concerns. She has close familial ties to citizens of Sudan, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt, and pr…

  • Applicant, a Somali-born U.S. citizen and hospital translator, was denied a clearance under Guidelines E and B. The Government proved a pattern of foreign relationships and foreign family ties, includ…

See all 413 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline B

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.