Skip to content
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline B · Foreign Influence

Foreign Real Estate Holding

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does foreign real estate holding affect a security clearance?

Foreign Real Estate Holding is an issue decided under Guideline B, Foreign Influence. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 501 hearing-level cases, and 53% of the 501 decided ended with access granted (264 granted, 237 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 501 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

501

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

53%

264 granted · 237 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions cited

The formal mitigating conditions the case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted and in cases that were denied. Each is shown with its paragraph number and a plain name. Read what each condition says.
  • ¶ 8(b) · Deep and longstanding ties to the United States

    In granted cases
    92
    In denied cases
    3
  • ¶ 8(a) · A conflict between foreign and United States interests is unlikely

    In granted cases
    91
    In denied cases
    5
  • ¶ 8(f) · Foreign interests too small to be used for influence

    In granted cases
    48
    In denied cases
    3
  • ¶ 8(e) · Reporting requirements met promptly

    In granted cases
    29
    In denied cases
    2
  • ¶ 8(c) · Contact so casual and infrequent that there is little risk

    In granted cases
    28
    In denied cases
    0

Circumstances credited in granted cases

The specific circumstances the judge expressly credited among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted.
  • deep U.S. ties · credited in 51 granted cases
  • foreign assets divested · credited in 7 granted cases

Recent decided examples

  • Applicant, an armed security supervisor for a U.S. installation in Kosovo, faced Guideline B allegations based on family ties, a home, and a bank account in Kosovo. He admitted all SOR allegations but…

  • Applicant, an engineer and former IDF service member, was denied allegations under Guideline B for foreign influence based on family, property, and financial ties to Israel. He admitted the SOR, but t…

  • The applicant's security clearance was denied due to unresolved security concerns under Guideline D (Sexual Behavior) and Guideline J (Criminal Conduct). The applicant admitted to paying for sex with …

  • The applicant's eligibility for access to classified information was denied due to unmitigated foreign influence security concerns. Despite admitting to all allegations, including maintaining foreign …

See all 501 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline B

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.