Skip to content
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline H · Drug Involvement

Marijuana

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does marijuana affect a security clearance?

Marijuana is an issue decided under Guideline H, Drug Involvement. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 3,224 hearing-level cases, and 25% of the 3,223 decided ended with access granted (799 granted, 2,424 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 3,223 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

3,224

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

25%

799 granted · 2,424 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions cited

The formal mitigating conditions the case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted and in cases that were denied. Each is shown with its paragraph number and a plain name. Read what each condition says.
  • ¶ 26(a) · So long ago, or so infrequent, that it is unlikely to recur

    In granted cases
    609
    In denied cases
    145
  • ¶ 26(b) · The involvement acknowledged, with abstinence established

    In granted cases
    460
    In denied cases
    73
  • ¶ 26(c) · Prescription misuse followed a prolonged illness and has ended

    In granted cases
    128
    In denied cases
    46
  • ¶ 26(d) · Treatment completed, with a favorable prognosis

    In granted cases
    28
    In denied cases
    7

Circumstances credited in granted cases

The specific circumstances the judge expressly credited among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted.
  • acknowledgment and remorse · credited in 51 granted cases
  • abstinence period documented · credited in 22 granted cases
  • signed intent with revocation clause · credited in 10 granted cases
  • passage of time · credited in 9 granted cases
  • severed ties to using friends · credited in 6 granted cases

Recent decided examples

  • The applicant mitigated security concerns related to drug involvement, criminal conduct, and personal conduct. He demonstrated significant rehabilitation efforts, including participation in a veterans…

  • The case involves an applicant seeking security clearance who faced allegations under Guideline B for foreign influence and Guideline H for drug involvement. The applicant admitted to the allegations …

  • The applicant mitigated the personal conduct security concern but failed to mitigate the drug involvement and substance misuse security concern. The applicant admitted to purchasing marijuana from Jan…

  • The applicant's security clearance was denied due to unresolved security concerns related to drug involvement and criminal conduct. While the applicant mitigated concerns under personal conduct and al…

See all 3,224 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline H

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.