Skip to content
CASE
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline H · Drug Involvement

Cocaine

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does cocaine affect a security clearance?

Cocaine is an issue decided under Guideline H, Drug Involvement. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 714 hearing-level cases, and 21% of the 714 decided ended with access granted (151 granted, 563 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 714 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

714

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

21%

151 granted · 563 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions cited

The formal mitigating conditions the case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted and in cases that were denied. Each is shown with its paragraph number and a plain name. Read what each condition says.

  • ¶ 26(a) · So long ago, or so infrequent, that it is unlikely to recur

    In granted cases
    95
    In denied cases
    35

  • ¶ 26(b) · The involvement acknowledged, with abstinence established

    In granted cases
    70
    In denied cases
    15

  • ¶ 26(c) · Prescription misuse followed a prolonged illness and has ended

    In granted cases
    31
    In denied cases
    8

  • ¶ 26(d) · Treatment completed, with a favorable prognosis

    In granted cases
    8
    In denied cases
    2

Circumstances credited in granted cases

The specific circumstances the judge expressly credited among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted.
  • acknowledgment and remorse · credited in 6 granted cases

Recent decided examples

  • ISCR Case No. 25-00354Granted2026

    The applicant mitigated security concerns related to drug involvement, criminal conduct, and personal conduct. He demonstrated significant rehabilitation efforts, including participation in a veterans…

  • ISCR Case No. 25-01563Granted2026

    This case involves security concerns regarding the applicant's alcohol consumption, drug involvement, psychological conditions, and personal conduct. The applicant admitted to several allegations rela…

  • ISCR Case No. 26-00013Denied2026

    The applicant's security clearance was denied due to unresolved security concerns related to drug involvement and criminal conduct. While the applicant mitigated concerns under personal conduct and al…

  • ISCR Case No. 24-01561Denied2026

    The case involves an applicant seeking a security clearance who faced allegations under multiple guidelines, including alcohol consumption, drug involvement, criminal conduct, and personal conduct. Th…

See all 714 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline H

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.