Skip to main content

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline H · Drug Involvement

Stated Intent to Use Again

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, never a prediction.

Decided cases
494
verified hearing-level decisions
Granted
15%
74 granted · 420 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions in play

The formal mitigating conditions (by official paragraph) that case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted vs denied. Extracted for a subset of cases; counts are cases, not percentages of everything. Read what each condition says.

ConditionIn granted casesIn denied cases
¶ 26(b)247
¶ 26(a)208
¶ 26(c)168

What judges credited in granted cases

Specific circumstances the judge expressly credited, among the granted cases on this issue where that detail was extracted (a subset of the record, so these are raw counts, not rates).

  • abstinence period documented · credited in 2 granted cases
  • acknowledgment and remorse · credited in 1 granted case

Recent decided examples

  • ISCR 18-01613 granted · 2019
    The applicant in this case was a 29-year-old individual employed by a defense contractor since October 2017, seeking a security clearance for the first time. The Department of Defense issued a Stateme
  • ISCR 19-02277 granted · 2020
    The applicant in this case was a 29-year-old engineer employed by a defense contractor since October 2018. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing security concerns under
  • ISCR 07-00966 denied · 2009
    The applicant in this case was a 28-year-old employee of a defense contractor seeking to retain his eligibility for a public trust position designated ADP I/II/III. The Defense Office of Hearings and
  • ISCR 17-04304 denied · 2019
    The applicant in this case was a 26-year-old welder employed by a defense contractor who applied for a security clearance in May 2015. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) cit

See all 494 decisions on this issue →

Related issues under Guideline H

Wondering how this issue plays against your own facts? Ask the assistant, or get a written, human-reviewed response through Answers. Descriptive research only: not legal advice or a prediction.