Skip to content
← Docket reports

Annual summary

State of DOHA adjudication, 2006

The decided public record for 2006: hearing-level industrial security clearance decisions, counted with their sample sizes. Descriptive of what was decided, not a prediction.← 20052007 →

Decided cases

1,367

416 granted · 951 denied

Grant rate

30%

-8 points compared with 2005 (38%) · 416 of 1,367

Appeal Board decisions

38

34 affirmed · 4 reversed or remanded

Outcomes by concern

Hearing and written record

  • Decided after a live hearing

    Cases
    968
    Grant rate
  • Decided on the written record

    Cases
    366
    Grant rate

Representation

  • Represented by a lawyer

    Cases
    280
    Grant rate
  • Self-represented

    Cases
    1,087
    Grant rate

An association, not proof of cause: the groups being compared differ in many ways.

How these numbers are measured

This report counts decided hearing-level industrial security clearance decisions dated 2006. Appeal Board decisions are counted separately and never mixed into the hearing figures. † marks a group built on fewer than 20 decided cases, too few to generalize, and a case raising several concerns counts under each of them, so those rows overlap. Definitions and checks are on the methodology page, and the same figures are available interactively on Statistics.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.