Annual summary
State of DOHA adjudication, 2010
Decided cases
1,289
450 granted · 839 denied
Grant rate
35%
-1 points compared with 2009 (36%) · 450 of 1,289
Appeal Board decisions
191
173 affirmed · 18 reversed or remanded
Outcomes by concern
| Concern | Cases | Granted | Denied | Grant rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F · Financial Considerations | 824 | 299 | 525 | |
| E · Personal Conduct | 406 | 81 | 325 | |
| J · Criminal Conduct | 167 | 36 | 131 | |
| H · Drug Involvement and Substance Misuse | 155 | 32 | 123 | |
| B · Foreign Influence | 132 | 60 | 72 | |
| G · Alcohol Consumption | 110 | 25 | 85 | |
| C · Foreign Preference | 68 | 27 | 41 | |
| D · Sexual Behavior | 34 | 7 | 27 | |
| K · Handling Protected Information | 15 | 6 | 9 | |
| M · Use of Information Technology | 15 | 3 | 12 | |
| I · Psychological Conditions | 4 | 2 | 2 | |
| L · Outside Activities | 3 | 1 | 2 |
- Cases
- 824
- Granted
- 299
- Denied
- 525
- Grant rate
- Cases
- 406
- Granted
- 81
- Denied
- 325
- Grant rate
- Cases
- 167
- Granted
- 36
- Denied
- 131
- Grant rate
H · Drug Involvement and Substance Misuse
- Cases
- 155
- Granted
- 32
- Denied
- 123
- Grant rate
- Cases
- 132
- Granted
- 60
- Denied
- 72
- Grant rate
- Cases
- 110
- Granted
- 25
- Denied
- 85
- Grant rate
- Cases
- 68
- Granted
- 27
- Denied
- 41
- Grant rate
- Cases
- 34
- Granted
- 7
- Denied
- 27
- Grant rate
K · Handling Protected Information
- Cases
- 15
- Granted
- 6
- Denied
- 9
- Grant rate
M · Use of Information Technology
- Cases
- 15
- Granted
- 3
- Denied
- 12
- Grant rate
- Cases
- 4
- Granted
- 2
- Denied
- 2
- Grant rate
- Cases
- 3
- Granted
- 1
- Denied
- 2
- Grant rate
Hearing and written record
| Path | Cases | Grant rate |
|---|---|---|
| Decided after a live hearing | 974 | |
| Decided on the written record | 305 |
Decided after a live hearing
- Cases
- 974
- Grant rate
Decided on the written record
- Cases
- 305
- Grant rate
Representation
| Representation | Cases | Grant rate |
|---|---|---|
| Represented by a lawyer | 240 | |
| Self-represented | 1,042 |
Represented by a lawyer
- Cases
- 240
- Grant rate
Self-represented
- Cases
- 1,042
- Grant rate
An association, not proof of cause: the groups being compared differ in many ways.
How these numbers are measured
This report counts decided hearing-level industrial security clearance decisions dated 2010. Appeal Board decisions are counted separately and never mixed into the hearing figures. † marks a group built on fewer than 20 decided cases, too few to generalize, and a case raising several concerns counts under each of them, so those rows overlap. Definitions and checks are on the methodology page, and the same figures are available interactively on Statistics.
Reading the statistics
- Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
- Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
- † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
- Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
- Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.
Where to go from here
Get help with my case
Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.
Ask a question →I do this for clients
Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.
For attorneys and firms →Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.