Skip to content
← Docket reports

Annual summary

State of DOHA adjudication, 2016

The decided public record for 2016: hearing-level industrial security clearance decisions, counted with their sample sizes. Descriptive of what was decided, not a prediction.← 20152017 →

Decided cases

1,654

682 granted · 972 denied

Grant rate

41%

-2 points compared with 2015 (43%) · 682 of 1,654

Appeal Board decisions

228

206 affirmed · 22 reversed or remanded

Outcomes by concern

Hearing and written record

  • Decided after a live hearing

    Cases
    982
    Grant rate
  • Decided on the written record

    Cases
    669
    Grant rate

Representation

  • Represented by a lawyer

    Cases
    296
    Grant rate
  • Self-represented

    Cases
    1,345
    Grant rate

An association, not proof of cause: the groups being compared differ in many ways.

How these numbers are measured

This report counts decided hearing-level industrial security clearance decisions dated 2016. Appeal Board decisions are counted separately and never mixed into the hearing figures. † marks a group built on fewer than 20 decided cases, too few to generalize, and a case raising several concerns counts under each of them, so those rows overlap. Definitions and checks are on the methodology page, and the same figures are available interactively on Statistics.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.