Statistics
Outcome patterns across decided public DOHA cases. The filters below narrow the view by concern, time period, representation, and judge. Descriptive statistics, not predictions. Data through September 2026.
Reference dates for comparisons: the current adjudicative guidelines took effect in June 2017, and updated marijuana guidance was issued in December 2021.
Key findings
Cases in view
6,253
decided public DOHA cases
Hearing decisions
5,135
decided after a hearing or on the written record
Appeal decisions
1,118
Appeal Board decisions, counted separately
Decisions span 1996 to 2026
Using this page: the filters above narrow every section, selecting a chart row opens the cases underneath it, and each section downloads as a CSV file.
Grant rates over time
How often clearances were granted, by year.
51% granted overall (2,591 of 5,091). Yearly rates ranged 32 to 66% where the yearly sample is large enough.
Swipe the chart for earlier years. Select any year to filter the page to it.
How to read this chart
Grey bars count the decisions published in each year, read against the left axis. The blue line is the grant rate for that year, read against the right axis, and it is drawn only for years with 20 or more decided cases. The shaded band over 1999 and 2000 marks two years when very few decisions were published: DOHA published few decisions online before 2002, and almost none survive for those two years. The dashed lines mark the June 2017 adjudicative guidelines and the December 2021 marijuana guidance taking effect. They do not claim that either change caused what the chart shows.
Outcomes by concern
How each type of concern was resolved.
- E · Personal Conduct
36% granted · 741 granted · 1,296 denied
- Personal conduct (unspecified)
41% granted · 321 granted · 457 denied
- Falsified the security form
17% granted · 108 granted · 532 denied
- Omission / failure to disclose
40% granted · 206 granted · 315 denied
- Questionable judgment
37% granted · 157 granted · 264 denied
- Lack of candor in an interview
17% granted · 66 granted · 319 denied
- Workplace rules violation
30% granted · 71 granted · 169 denied
- Pattern of dishonesty / rule violations
21% granted · 34 granted · 131 denied
- Personal conduct (unspecified)
- F · Financial Considerations
51% granted · 892 granted · 864 denied
- Financial (unspecified)
50% granted · 649 granted · 662 denied
- Credit-card debt
51% granted · 265 granted · 257 denied
- Unpaid taxes
42% granted · 185 granted · 258 denied
- Medical debt
54% granted · 192 granted · 166 denied
- Failure to file taxes
38% granted · 118 granted · 195 denied
- Mortgage / home-loan debt
60% granted · 178 granted · 119 denied
- Auto-loan debt
52% granted · 121 granted · 113 denied
- Civil judgment against applicant
46% granted · 101 granted · 118 denied
- Utility / phone debt
55% granted · 116 granted · 95 denied
- Student-loan debt
48% granted · 94 granted · 102 denied
- Bankruptcy filing
55% granted · 105 granted · 86 denied
- Financial (unspecified)
- B · Foreign Influence
67% granted · 839 granted · 409 denied
- Foreign relationship (unspecified)
66% granted · 512 granted · 261 denied
- Parent in a foreign country
67% granted · 470 granted · 234 denied
- Sibling in a foreign country
70% granted · 387 granted · 165 denied
- In law in foreign country
65% granted · 216 granted · 117 denied
- Spouse dual / foreign citizen
60% granted · 128 granted · 86 denied
- Extended family in foreign country
68% granted · 145 granted · 67 denied
- Foreign real estate
71% granted · 117 granted · 47 denied
- Foreign relationship (unspecified)
- J · Criminal Conduct
33% granted · 318 granted · 643 denied
- Criminal conduct (unspecified)
32% granted · 157 granted · 333 denied
- DUI / DWI (criminal)
39% granted · 101 granted · 160 denied
- Drug related criminal charge
28% granted · 53 granted · 136 denied
- Criminal conduct (unspecified)
- H · Drug Involvement and Substance Misuse
40% granted · 346 granted · 509 denied
- Marijuana
41% granted · 305 granted · 434 denied
- Drug involvement (unspecified)
39% granted · 140 granted · 221 denied
- Cocaine
35% granted · 61 granted · 113 denied
- Marijuana
- G · Alcohol Consumption
42% granted · 244 granted · 338 denied
- DUI / DWI (alcohol)
43% granted · 185 granted · 241 denied
- Binge / intoxication pattern
38% granted · 108 granted · 176 denied
- Alcohol incident (unspecified)
43% granted · 115 granted · 151 denied
- Alcohol use disorder diagnosed
40% granted · 91 granted · 139 denied
- Treatment non compliance
32% granted · 54 granted · 117 denied
- Continued use after treatment
31% granted · 52 granted · 116 denied
- DUI / DWI (alcohol)
- C · Foreign Preference
68% granted · 293 granted · 141 denied
- Foreign passport possession / use
67% granted · 197 granted · 97 denied
- Foreign citizenship acquisition / application
63% granted · 117 granted · 68 denied
- Foreign preference (unspecified)
71% granted · 120 granted · 48 denied
- Foreign passport possession / use
- D · Sexual Behavior
25% granted · 60 granted · 178 denied
Too few cases to break this concern into specific issues.
- K · Handling Protected Information
51% granted · 73 granted · 70 denied
Too few cases to break this concern into specific issues.
- M · Use of Information Technology
35% granted · 48 granted · 90 denied
Too few cases to break this concern into specific issues.
- I · Psychological Conditions
41% granted · 47 granted · 67 denied
Too few cases to break this concern into specific issues.
- L · Outside Activities
50% granted · 11 granted · 11 denied
Too few cases to break this concern into specific issues.
- A · Allegiance to the United States
33% granted · 1 granted · 2 denied
Too few cases to break this concern into specific issues.
† marks fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable. A case can raise several concerns, so the rows overlap.
Mitigations judges credited most
How often each mitigation was expressly accepted by the judge, not merely claimed, across the cases in this view. This is a count of how often something was credited, so the bars are neutral: they carry no outcome.
Outcomes by representation
Whether represented and self-represented applicants were granted at different rates.
Represented by a lawyer
51% granted · 2,591 granted · 2,500 denied
Self-represented
30% granted · 6,425 granted · 14,862 denied
Difference
1.7 times
the grant rate with a lawyer
| Representation | Cases | Granted | Denied | Grant rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-represented | 21,287 | 6,425 | 14,862 | |
| Represented by a lawyer | 5,091 | 2,591 | 2,500 | |
| A personal representative who is not a lawyer | 117 | 68 | 49 | |
| Not stated in the decision | 9 | 3 | 6 |
- Cases
- 21,287
- Granted
- 6,425
- Denied
- 14,862
- Grant rate
- Cases
- 5,091
- Granted
- 2,591
- Denied
- 2,500
- Grant rate
A personal representative who is not a lawyer
- Cases
- 117
- Granted
- 68
- Denied
- 49
- Grant rate
- Cases
- 9
- Granted
- 3
- Denied
- 6
- Grant rate
An association, not proof of cause: the groups being compared differ in many ways. Select a row to filter the page.
Outcomes by judge
How the cases each judge decided were resolved.
| Administrative Judge | Cases | Granted | Denied | Grant rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark W. Harvey | 129 | 34 | 95 | Filter |
| Edward W. Loughran | 98 | 44 | 54 | Filter |
| LeRoy F. Foreman | 93 | 45 | 47 | Filter |
| Richard A. Cefola | 89 | 54 | 35 | Filter |
| Candace Le'i Garcia | 68 | 39 | 29 | Filter |
| Carol G. Ricciardello | 65 | 26 | 39 | Filter |
| Wilford H. Ross | 59 | 41 | 18 | Filter |
| Darlene Lokey Anderson | 58 | 22 | 36 | Filter |
| Marc E. Curry | 56 | 28 | 28 | Filter |
| Robert E. Coacher | 55 | 19 | 36 | Filter |
| Roger C. Wesley | 51 | 20 | 31 | Filter |
| Erin C. Hogan | 51 | 34 | 17 | Filter |
| Braden M. Murphy | 50 | 24 | 26 | Filter |
| John Bayard Glendon | 47 | 18 | 29 | Filter |
| Juan J. Rivera | 47 | 28 | 19 | Filter |
- Cases
- 129
- Granted
- 34
- Denied
- 95
- Grant rate
- Filter
- Cases
- 98
- Granted
- 44
- Denied
- 54
- Grant rate
- Filter
- Cases
- 93
- Granted
- 45
- Denied
- 47
- Grant rate
- Filter
- Cases
- 89
- Granted
- 54
- Denied
- 35
- Grant rate
- Filter
- Cases
- 68
- Granted
- 39
- Denied
- 29
- Grant rate
- Filter
- Cases
- 65
- Granted
- 26
- Denied
- 39
- Grant rate
- Filter
- Cases
- 59
- Granted
- 41
- Denied
- 18
- Grant rate
- Filter
- Cases
- 58
- Granted
- 22
- Denied
- 36
- Grant rate
- Filter
- Cases
- 56
- Granted
- 28
- Denied
- 28
- Grant rate
- Filter
- Cases
- 55
- Granted
- 19
- Denied
- 36
- Grant rate
- Filter
- Cases
- 51
- Granted
- 20
- Denied
- 31
- Grant rate
- Filter
- Cases
- 51
- Granted
- 34
- Denied
- 17
- Grant rate
- Filter
- Cases
- 50
- Granted
- 24
- Denied
- 26
- Grant rate
- Filter
- Cases
- 47
- Granted
- 18
- Denied
- 29
- Grant rate
- Filter
- Cases
- 47
- Granted
- 28
- Denied
- 19
- Grant rate
- Filter
† marks judges with fewer than 20 decided cases in this window. Judges hear different mixes of cases, so these rates describe the decided record, not the judges.
Appeal outcomes
How appealed decisions were treated by the Appeal Board.
The Appeal Board reviews the specific errors a party claims. It can affirm a decision, leaving it in place; reverse it, replacing the outcome; or remand it, sending it back to the judge. It does not rehear the case. Based on 3,584 appeal decisions with a verified outcome. Year and concern filters apply here; judge and representation filters do not.
- affirmed · 3,146 of 3,584 (88%)
- reversed · 239 of 3,584 (7%)
- remanded · 199 of 3,584 (6%)
Most appeals do not change the outcome: the Board overturned about 7% of the decisions brought to it.
Appeals by party, with outcomes
Applicants appeal denials; the Government appeals grants it disagrees with. Whether an outcome helped the applicant therefore depends on who appealed.
| Appealed by | Appeals | Affirmed | Reversed | Remanded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The applicant | 3,247 | 3,082 (95%) | 14 (0%) | 151 (5%) |
| The Government (Department Counsel) | 327 | 55 (17%) | 224 (69%) | 48 (15%) |
| Both parties | 10 | 9 (90%) | 1 (10%) | 0 (0%) |
The applicant
- Appeals
- 3,247
- Affirmed
- 3,082 (95%)
- Reversed
- 14 (0%)
- Remanded
- 151 (5%)
The Government (Department Counsel)
- Appeals
- 327
- Affirmed
- 55 (17%)
- Reversed
- 224 (69%)
- Remanded
- 48 (15%)
Both parties
- Appeals
- 10
- Affirmed
- 9 (90%)
- Reversed
- 1 (10%)
- Remanded
- 0 (0%)
Grounds for reversal or remand
The grounds the Board gave. A case can have more than one.
Errors alleged on appeal
The errors the parties raised, across every appeal in this selection.
Error found, but harmless
15%
of affirmances · 478 of 3,146
The Board agreed the judge erred but left the outcome in place, because the error did not change the result.
Most-cited authorities
- Department of the Navy v. Egan2,414
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n of the United States v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.966
- ISCR Case No. 06-17409 at 3 (App. Bd. Oct. 12228
- Dorfmont v. Brown208
- ISCR Case No. 06-17409164
- ISCR Case No. 06-10320 at 2 (App. Bd. Nov. 7162
- ISCR Case No. 06-11172 at 3 (App. Bd. Sep. 4140
- ISCR Case No. 06-1032081
Appeal Board judges by number of appeals
Appeals are decided by three-member panels, so an outcome belongs to the panel and not to any single judge. There is no per-judge rate for that reason.
A structured reading of the decided public Appeal Board record. The outcome the Board stated matched our independent read in 100% of cases.
Browse appeal decisionsQuestions about these statistics
The statistics assistant is part of Professional.
The statistics on this page are free, with or without a subscription.
It answers questions about the figures on this page, inside the filters you have set, with the denominator behind every number.
Professional plan detailsPublications and measured series
Ongoing analyses computed from the decided record, each on its own page, with its method and the counts behind every rate.
- Measured timelines
How long each stage took, measured from dates stated in the decisions.
- Time since the conduct
How long before the decision the last incident occurred.
- Candor in the record
How falsification and omission allegations were resolved.
- Veterans in the record
Decisions that state United States military service, counted by branch.
- Decisions by country
Foreign-influence decisions arranged by the country involved.
- The Issue Encyclopedia
Every specific issue inside each guideline, with its decided record.
- The statutory bars
The bars set by statute, and how they appear in decided cases.
- Docket reports
The decided record summarized the same way every quarter and every year.
Granted ÷ decided; † marks groups under 20 cases. Full methodology
Reading the statistics
- Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
- Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
- † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
- Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
- Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.
Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.