Skip to main content

Time since the conduct

The security guidelines treat the passage of time as relevant but set no fixed interval. This page measures the decided record: for every case that dates its most recent incident, the years between that incident and the decision, split by how the case was resolved. Measured history with the counts behind every rate, not advice and not a prediction about any case. The duration of the process itself is addressed separately on measured timelines.

All measured concern types combined

Pooling every measured concern type below (8,164 measured concerns; a case measured under two types counts once per type): favorable decisions came a median of 3.0 years after the last incident, unfavorable ones 2.5 years. The share resolved favorably rises with time:

Time since the last incidentMeasured concernsResolved favorably
Still ongoing at the decision5532.0%
Under 1 year78214.5%
1 to 2 years1,73924.7%
2 to 3 years1,80230.2%
3 to 5 years1,94132.3%
5 to 10 years1,02135.7%
10 years or more32625.5%

Time is one factor among many: older conduct is usually accompanied by other changes.

Drug involvement (Guideline H)

Among decided cases that date the last drug use, the median gap before a favorable decision was 2.5 years, against 2.2 years before an unfavorable one. The full breakdown:

Time since the last drug useCasesResolved favorably
Still ongoing at the decision1210.8%
Under 1 year29811.7%
1 to 2 years91625.4%
2 to 3 years71328.9%
3 to 5 years65528.7%
5 to 10 years27139.1%
10 years or more3312 of 33

2,886 of 3,588 decided cases date the conduct; the rest never state a date. Groups under 50 cases show raw counts instead of a rate.

Alcohol (Guideline G)

Among decided cases that date the last alcohol incident, the median gap before a favorable decision was 2.9 years, against 2.2 years before an unfavorable one. The full breakdown:

Time since the last alcohol incidentCasesResolved favorably
Still ongoing at the decision2592.3%
Under 1 year23423.1%
1 to 2 years30825.3%
2 to 3 years37136.4%
3 to 5 years38443.5%
5 to 10 years13947.5%
10 years or more1810 of 18

1,454 of 2,112 decided cases date the conduct; the rest never state a date. Groups under 50 cases show raw counts instead of a rate.

Criminal conduct (Guideline J)

Among decided cases that date the most recent offense, the median gap before a favorable decision was 3.4 years, against 3.1 years before an unfavorable one. The full breakdown:

Time since the most recent offenseCasesResolved favorably
Still ongoing at the decision1552.6%
Under 1 year2298.3%
1 to 2 years44921.4%
2 to 3 years60927.8%
3 to 5 years73829.7%
5 to 10 years49230.9%
10 years or more23121.2%

2,748 of 3,927 decided cases date the conduct; the rest never state a date. Groups under 50 cases show raw counts instead of a rate.

Sexual behavior (Guideline D)

Among decided cases that date the most recent incident, the median gap before a favorable decision was 4.7 years, against 4.1 years before an unfavorable one. The full breakdown:

Time since the most recent incidentCasesResolved favorably
Still ongoing at the decision130 of 13
Under 1 year111 of 11
1 to 2 years293 of 29
2 to 3 years407 of 40
3 to 5 years7122.5%
5 to 10 years6723.9%
10 years or more346 of 34

252 of 633 decided cases date the conduct; the rest never state a date. Groups under 50 cases show raw counts instead of a rate.

Mishandling protected information (Guideline K)

Among decided cases that date the most recent violation, the median gap before a favorable decision was 3.1 years, against 3.0 years before an unfavorable one. The full breakdown:

Time since the most recent violationCasesResolved favorably
Still ongoing at the decision00 cases
Under 1 year84 of 8
1 to 2 years2615 of 26
2 to 3 years4017 of 40
3 to 5 years4923 of 49
5 to 10 years2212 of 22
10 years or more53 of 5

150 of 291 decided cases date the conduct; the rest never state a date. Groups under 50 cases show raw counts instead of a rate.

Misuse of IT systems (Guideline M)

Among decided cases that date the most recent misuse, the median gap before a favorable decision was 3.7 years, against 3.6 years before an unfavorable one. The full breakdown:

Time since the most recent misuseCasesResolved favorably
Still ongoing at the decision50 of 5
Under 1 year20 of 2
1 to 2 years115 of 11
2 to 3 years2911 of 29
3 to 5 years4414 of 44
5 to 10 years3012 of 30
10 years or more53 of 5

121 of 297 decided cases date the conduct; the rest never state a date. Groups under 50 cases show raw counts instead of a rate.

By specific incident type

The same measurement, cut by the specific kinds of incidents a case alleged. A row is read as follows: among decided cases involving a DUI, the years between the last such incident and the decision, in cases resolved favorably and in cases resolved unfavorably.

Incident typeDated casesMedian years, favorableMedian years, unfavorable
Marijuana2,5362.42.1
DUI / DWI (alcohol)1,1083.02.2
DUI / DWI (criminal)8003.12.8
Binge / intoxication pattern6712.82.0
Drug related criminal charge5984.12.9
Cocaine5842.62.2
Alcohol use disorder diagnosed4742.61.9
Assault / battery4313.43.0
Drug distribution / dealing4102.42.0
Continued use after treatment3602.61.7
Fraud / deception criminal3485.13.2
Stated intent to use again3372.21.5
Treatment non compliance3332.61.8
Theft / larceny3084.14.0
Psilocybin2882.22.0
Drug test failure2873.32.2

Only incident types with at least 100 dated cases are shown. The time measured is to the most recent incident of that concern in the case. Each link opens the decided cases behind the number.

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level industrial cases in the public DOHA record, across six incident-shaped concern types (drugs, alcohol, criminal conduct, sexual behavior, protected information, IT misuse). For each case we read the date of the most recent conduct from the decision text itself, and every extracted date must be backed by an exact quote from the decision that contains that date; anything the text does not date is counted as undated rather than guessed. Dates anchor to the incident, arrest, or charge; where a decision dates nothing but the conviction, the conviction date stands in, which tends to understate the time passed. Dismissals, sentencing, and firings never count as conduct dates. Concern types that are ongoing situations rather than incidents (debts, diagnoses, family ties) are deliberately not measured this way. When only a year is stated, mid-year is assumed; a small number of cases with defective decision dates are excluded. Time is measured to the decision date, not to today. These are associations in decided history: more time passing is usually accompanied by other changes, and nothing here predicts any pending case. The rules the judges apply are described in the 13 guidelines.