Skip to main content

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline H · Drug Involvement

Drug Possession (charge or arrest)

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, never a prediction.

Decided cases
85
verified hearing-level decisions
Granted
9%
8 granted · 77 denied or revoked

Official mitigating conditions in play

The formal mitigating conditions (by official paragraph) that case profiles identified on this issue, in cases that were granted vs denied. Extracted for a subset of cases; counts are cases, not percentages of everything. Read what each condition says.

ConditionIn granted casesIn denied cases
¶ 26(a)57
¶ 26(b)45

Recent decided examples

  • ISCR 16-00851.h1 granted · 2018
    The judge found that the applicant mitigated the personal conduct concerns related to his past marijuana use and arrests. The applicant's conduct was deemed to not cast doubt on his current reliabilit
  • ISCR 09-08299.h1 granted · 2010
    The judge found that the applicant mitigated the drug involvement security concerns, granting eligibility for access to classified information. The applicant admitted to past drug use, including marij
  • ISCR 20-01095 denied · 2021
    The applicant in this case was a 37-year-old employee of a federal contractor who sought a security clearance. The Department of Defense issued a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing concerns under Guide
  • ISCR 20-00125 denied · 2022
    The applicant in this case was a 31-year-old engineer seeking a security clearance, who faced allegations under Guideline H regarding drug involvement and substance misuse, as well as Guideline J and

See all 85 decisions on this issue →

Related issues under Guideline H

Wondering how this issue plays against your own facts? Ask the assistant, or get a written, human-reviewed response through Answers. Descriptive research only: not legal advice or a prediction.