Skip to content
← The Issue Encyclopedia

Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline E · Personal Conduct

Failure/Refusal to Cooperate with Security Processing

What the decided record shows for this issue, computed from public DOHA hearing-level decisions. Descriptive history, not a prediction.

Does failure/refusal to cooperate with security processing affect a security clearance?

Failure/Refusal to Cooperate with Security Processing is an issue decided under Guideline E, Personal Conduct. In the decided DOHA record it appears in 57 hearing-level cases, and 11% of the 57 decided ended with access granted (6 granted, 51 denied). The mitigating conditions judges credited most often, and example decisions either way, are below.

Basis: 57 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.

More questions people ask the record

Decided cases

57

hearing-level decisions raising this issue

Granted

11%

6 granted · 51 denied or revoked

Recent decided examples

  • The applicant in this case sought a security clearance and faced allegations primarily under the personal conduct guideline (Guideline E). The Statement of Reasons (SOR) outlined concerns regarding th…

  • The allegations under Guideline D for sexual behavior were withdrawn by Department Counsel at the start of the hearing. The judge noted that the allegations were misplaced and more appropriately addre…

  • The applicant's security clearance was denied due to unresolved security concerns under Guidelines D, J, and E. The allegations included felony sexual assault on a minor, multiple criminal conduct cha…

  • The applicant in this case was a 28-year-old technician employed by a defense contractor, who sought to renew his security clearance. The adjudicative guidelines at issue included Financial Considerat…

See all 57 decisions on this issue

Related issues under Guideline E

How these numbers are measured

Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.

Reading the statistics

  • Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
  • Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
  • † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
  • Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
  • Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.

Where to go from here

Get help with my case

Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.

Ask a question →

I do this for clients

Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.

For attorneys and firms →

Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.