Issue Encyclopedia · Guideline E · Personal Conduct
Questionable Judgment (general)
Does questionable judgment (general) affect a security clearance?
Basis: 1,431 decided hearing-level cases raising this issue. Descriptive history of decided cases, not a prediction.
Decided cases
1,431
hearing-level decisions raising this issue
Granted
24%
349 granted · 1,082 denied or revoked
Official mitigating conditions cited
| Condition | In granted cases | In denied cases |
|---|---|---|
| ¶ 17(c) · Minor, long ago, infrequent, or under unique circumstances | 121 | 28 |
| ¶ 17(d) · The behavior acknowledged, with counseling or other positive steps | 80 | 13 |
| ¶ 17(e) · Steps taken to reduce vulnerability to pressure | 66 | 12 |
| ¶ 17(a) · A prompt, good-faith correction made before being confronted | 58 | 9 |
| ¶ 17(b) · The omission followed advice of counsel, and full cooperation followed | 40 | 4 |
| ¶ 17(g) · The association was unwitting or has ended | 12 | 3 |
¶ 17(c) · Minor, long ago, infrequent, or under unique circumstances
- In granted cases
- 121
- In denied cases
- 28
¶ 17(d) · The behavior acknowledged, with counseling or other positive steps
- In granted cases
- 80
- In denied cases
- 13
¶ 17(e) · Steps taken to reduce vulnerability to pressure
- In granted cases
- 66
- In denied cases
- 12
¶ 17(a) · A prompt, good-faith correction made before being confronted
- In granted cases
- 58
- In denied cases
- 9
¶ 17(b) · The omission followed advice of counsel, and full cooperation followed
- In granted cases
- 40
- In denied cases
- 4
¶ 17(g) · The association was unwitting or has ended
- In granted cases
- 12
- In denied cases
- 3
Circumstances credited in granted cases
- acknowledgment and remorse · credited in 23 granted cases
- passage of time · credited in 6 granted cases
- rehabilitation evidence · credited in 3 granted cases
- corrected falsification promptly · credited in 2 granted cases
- signed intent with revocation clause · credited in 1 granted case
Recent decided examples
Applicant, a 32-year-old manager with a physics degree and MBA, faced allegations under Guidelines I and E based on a long history of depression, suicide attempts, hospitalizations, threatening texts,…
The Appeal Board affirmed the Judge’s grant of eligibility. DoD had raised Guideline E and Guideline G concerns based on Applicant’s long history of alcohol misuse, relapse after stating he would stop…
The applicant's security clearance was denied due to financial concerns under Guideline F, where he admitted to five delinquent credit card accounts totaling approximately $68,861. Although he took ov…
The applicant's security clearance was denied due to unresolved security concerns related to drug involvement and criminal conduct. While the applicant mitigated concerns under personal conduct and al…
Related issues under Guideline E
How these numbers are measured
Scope: decided hearing-level cases whose per-allegation profile records this issue, matched to the same issue value the search filters use, so a count here and a filtered search always agree. A case raising several issues counts under each one. The mitigating conditions and the credited circumstances below were extracted for a subset of the record, so both are counts of cases rather than rates. Pages exist only for issues with at least 25 decided cases, and † marks any split built on fewer than 20.
Reading the statistics
- Granted = access granted or continued; Denied = denied or revoked.
- Grant rate = granted ÷ (granted + denied).
- † marks figures based on fewer than 20 cases, too few to be reliable.
- Hovering any rate shows its statistical range (a 95% confidence interval).
- Figures are descriptive counts over decided, public DOHA ISCR decisions, never predictions or assessments of any pending case.
Where to go from here
Get help with my case
Send us your question, or the Statement of Reasons you received. No charge, and a CASE analyst reads it. Usually five to ten business days.
Ask a question →I do this for clients
Rank every decision by how closely it matches a matter, see how the assigned judge has ruled, and keep it together with cited exports.
For attorneys and firms →Decided public cases: descriptive, never a prediction.